Ward v Lochore

Case [2020] NZHC 253


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA KIRIKIRIROA ROHE

CIV-2018-419-278

[2020] NZHC 253

BETWEEN

RUSSELL STUART WARD

Plaintiff

AND

ANGUS JAMES LOCHORE

Defendant

Hearing: On the papers

Judgment:

24 February 2020


JUDGMENT OF KATZ J

[Application to stay costs award pending appeal]


This judgment was delivered by me on 24 February 2020 at 4:30pm Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

Solicitors:           Bryce Bluett, Hamilton Counsel:      W C Pyke, Barrister, Auckland Copy to:     R S Ward (Plaintiff)

WARD v LOCHORE [2020] NZHC 253 [24 February 2020]

[1]    In a judgment delivered on 12 June 2019 I struck out proceedings brought by Mr Ward against Mr Lochore following the termination of Mr Ward’s lease of commercial premises.1 I made an award of costs  and disbursements  in  favour of  Mr Lochore, as the successful party, on a 2B scale basis.

[2]    Mr Ward subsequently applied to the Court of Appeal for an extension of time to appeal the costs award against him.2 He also filed an application in this Court, seeking to stay the costs award, pending determination of his proposed appeal.

[3]    By judgment dated 24 February 2020, the Court declined to grant an extension of time to appeal, on the basis that Mr Ward’s appeal lacked merit and faced insurmountable barriers.3

[4]    It necessarily follows that the stay application filed in this Court is now moot. It is accordingly dismissed. Mr Lochore is entitled to costs in respect of the stay application on a 2B scale basis.


Katz J


1      Ward v Lochore [2019] NZHC 1314.

2      Pursuant to r 29A of the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005.

3      Ward v Lochore [2020] NZCA 23.

Details
AGLC
Ward v Lochore [2020] NZHC 253
Case
[2020] NZHC 253
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Ward v Lochore involved a plaintiff, Russell Stuart Ward, who brought proceedings against the defendant, Angus James Lochore, after the termination of Ward’s lease of commercial premises. Following the termination, Ward initiated legal action against Lochore. The High Court of New Zealand, Hamilton Registry, presided over the case, with Katz J delivering the judgment on 24 February 2020. The court had previously struck out the proceedings and awarded costs and disbursements to Lochore as the successful party.

The legal issues the court needed to address involved Ward's application to the Court of Appeal for an extension of time to appeal the costs award against him. Ward also sought to stay the costs award pending the determination of his proposed appeal. The Court of Appeal had already declined to grant an extension of time to appeal, finding that Ward's appeal lacked merit and faced insurmountable barriers. This led to the stay application in the High Court becoming moot.

Katz J dismissed Ward's application to stay the costs award, affirming that Lochore was entitled to costs in respect of the stay application on a 2B scale basis. The court held that since the appeal lacked merit and faced insurmountable barriers, there was no need to stay the costs award. Therefore, the stay application was dismissed, and Lochore was to receive costs associated with the stay application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.