Wanganui District Council v Page HC Wanganui CIV-2010-483-134
[2011] NZHC 1286
•11 October 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WANGANUI REGISTRY
CIV-2010-483-134
IN THE MATTER OF the Insolvency Act 2006
AND IN THE MATTER OF the bankruptcy of ADRIAN NEIL PAGE
BETWEEN WANGANUI DISTRICT COUNCIL Judgment Creditor
ANDADRIAN NEIL PAGE Judgment Debtor
Judgment: 11 October 2011 at 3:30 PM
DECISION OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE D.I. GENDALL
This decision of Associate Judge Gendall was delivered on 11 October 2011 at 3.30 pm under r 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Solicitors: Armstrong Barton, Solicitors, PO Box 441, Wanganui
[1] In a judgment I issued in this proceeding on 21 July 2011 I dismissed an application made on 14 March 2011 by the judgment debtor Adrian Neil Page (Mr
WANGANUI DISTRICT COUNCIL V AN PAGE HC WANG CIV-2010-483-134 11 October 2011
Page) for an order effectively annulling his own bankruptcy. Mr Page was adjudicated bankrupt by this Court on 24 February 2011.
[2] In that judgment I reserved costs.
[3] Then on 30 August 2011 I issued a minute in this proceeding on the question of costs. This minute gave directions regarding the filing of Memoranda on costs by both the Official Assignee and the judgment debtor, as the judgment creditor had already filed a memorandum dated 1 August 2011 seeking costs.
[4] The Official Assignee has sought not to file any Memorandum as to costs here.
[5] In addition, as I understand the position from the Registrar, notwithstanding this court Minute of 30 August 2011 giving the judgment debtor until 20 September
2011 to file and serve any Memorandum he may wish on the costs question, Mr Page has advised that he does not intend to file a Memorandum or make any submissions.
[6] That said, I now deal with the question of costs, based upon the Memorandum from counsel for the judgment creditor, and the other material on the file.
[7] In my judgment in this proceeding dated 21 July 2011 I noted that Ms Woodcock, who appeared as counsel for the judgment creditor, Wanganui District Council and also for the Official Assignee to oppose the application for an annulment order was successful in that opposition.
[8] As such, in the usual course where costs follow the event, (as set out in r
14.2(a) High Court Rules,) the judgment creditor here would be entitled to costs on its successful opposition to the annulment application.
[9] In this case I see no reason to depart from that general principle and the usual position. An order is now made therefore awarding costs to the judgment creditor against Mr Page with respect to this application on a category 2B basis together with disbursements as fixed by the Registrar.
‘Associate Judge D.I. Gendall’
0
0
1