IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2024-404-003197
[2025] NZHC 43
UNDER the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 IN THE MATTER OF
an application for interim relief pending appeals
BETWEEN
MEI WANG
Appellant
AND
KĀINGA ORA – HOMES AND COMMUNITIES
Respondent
Hearing: 15 January 2025 Appearances:
Appellant self-represented F F Nizam for respondent
Judgment:
3 February 2025
REASONS JUDGMENT OF JOHNSTONE J
This judgment was delivered by me on 3 February 2025 at 10 am pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Luke Cunningham & Clere, Wellington
WANG v KĀINGA ORA – HOMES AND COMMUNITIES [2025] NZHC 43 [3 February 2025]
[1] During a telephone conference on 15 January 2025, Mei Wang sought to extend an order made by Muir J on 9 January 2024, prohibiting her eviction from a dwelling owned by Kāinga Ora in Ōtāhuhu, pending the determination of appeals brought against decisions of a District Court Judge.
[2] I declined to extend Muir J’s order, indicating that I would issue reasons, and address the appeals, later. I now do so.
Background
[3] Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities is a Crown entity, established under the Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities Act 2019.1 Its functions include “to provide rental housing, principally for those who need it most”.2
[4] The dwelling in Ōtāhuhu has three bedrooms. Ms Wang commenced to live there, on her own, in accordance with a tenancy of social housing, in December 2022. In June 2023, Kāinga Ora sought access to the dwelling, it says for the purpose of ensuring its compliance with the Healthy Homes standards.3
[5] On 26 October 2023, the Tenancy Tribunal directed Ms Wang to allow Kāinga Ora access. Ms Wang applied to the Tribunal for a rehearing of Kāinga Ora’s application for access, but the Tribunal dismissed Ms Wang’s rehearing application.
[6] In the meantime, Kāinga Ora issued a notice to terminate Ms Wang’s tenancy. The notice was issued with reference to s 53B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (the Act). That provision permits the termination of tenancies of social housing in various circumstances, including (in the case of tenancies such as Ms Wang’s) where Kāinga Ora considers that transfer to different social housing is “necessary or desirable for any reason” and “[that] other housing is appropriate for the tenant’s housing needs as most recently assessed (regardless of when that assessment took place)”.
1 Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities Act 2019, ss 8 and 9(1).
2 Section 13(1).
3 Residential Tenancies (Healthy Homes Standards) Regulations 2019, applicable to Kāinga Ora from 1 July 2024 (see schedule 1, cl 2(1)).
Kāinga Ora had, and continues to have, a one-bedroom dwelling available for Ms Wang, which it has assessed as appropriate for her needs.
[7] On 22 May 2024, the Tribunal terminated Ms Wang’s tenancy of the dwelling, and granted Kāinga Ora possession.4 Ms Wang’s application for rehearing in respect of that decision was dismissed…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wang v Kāinga Ora - Homes and Communities and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NZHC 43
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court declined to extend the interim order, reasoning that Ms Wang's proceeding in the High Court appeared to lack jurisdiction as it did not identify a point of law. The court found that Ms Wang's appeals cited only evidential and procedural concerns, which are not grounds for appeal under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Furthermore, the court noted that Ms Wang's conduct during her District Court appeal suggested a lack of merit and an inclination to delay proceedings. The court also highlighted that even if Ms Wang were to be re-housed before the High Court decided her proceeding, it would not render the proceeding nugatory. The court ordered that Ms Wang's proceeding be listed for mention to determine its jurisdiction, and directed Ms Wang to file a memorandum identifying any point of law she wished to argue on appeal by 5 pm on 7 February 2025.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.