IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NELSON REGISTRY
CIV 2010-442-445 [2012] NZHC 2763
IN THE MATTER of Property Law Act 2007
AND
IN THE MATTER of an application under section 327 for relief in respect of landlocked land
BETWEEN ASHLEY JOHN WAGG AND OTHERS Plaintiffs
ANDSQUALLY COVE FORESTRY LIMITED AND OTHERS
First Defendants
ANDMARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Second Defendant
Hearing: 11-15 June 2012
Closing submissions and memoranda filed between 26 June 2012 and
28 August 2012
Counsel: J M Fitchett and R D J Fitchett for the Plaintiff
L J Taylor and G Downing for the First Defendant
P J Radich for the Second Defendant
Judgment: 19 October 2012
JUDGMENT OF MALLON J
Contents
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... [1] Background........................................................................................................................................ [7] The layout of the land ..................................................................................................................... [7] The uses to which the land is put .................................................................................................. [12] The private roads at issue............................................................................................................. [15] Bill Bryants Road (the red and blue road) is built ........................................................................ [21] Subdivisions.................................................................................................................................. [22]
Mr Thornley’s arrival in the Bay .................................................................................................. [25] Access arrangements negotiated with Mr Thornley ..................................................................... [27] The new road/the yellow road is built........................................................................................... [36]
WAGG v SQUALLY COVE FORESTRY LIMITED HC NEL CIV 2010-442-445 [19 October 2012]
Mr Thornley wishes to close red road .......................................................................................... [41] These proceedings and offers to settle .......................................................................................... [44] The suitability of the roads ............................................................................................................. [47] Bill Bryants Road ......................................................................................................................... [47] The yellow road ............................................................................................................................ [52] The foreshore road........................................................................................................................ [54] Taipari Road ................................................................................................................................. [57] The Law ........................................................................................................................................... [59] Landlocked ................................................................................................................................... [59] Relief............................................................................................................................................. [61] Some overarching issues ................................................................................................................. [64] Sea access..................................................................................................................................... [65]
Is land landlocked if it has a legal right of way over Taipari Road?............................................ [72] Is land landlocked if offer re yellow road is reasonable? ............................................................. [76] Was the offer re yellow road reasonable? ..................................................................................... [79] Is land landlocked if access has not been closed? ........................................................................ [93] Agreement in relation to blue road ............................................................................................... [95]
Each plaintiff ’s individual position.............................................................................................. [100] a) McInnes (sixth plaintiffs) ......................................................................................................... [101] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [101] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [104] Yellow road ..................................................................................................................................[113] Purple road..................................................................................................................................[115] Relief............................................................................................................................................[116]
b) Muir (second plaintiff) ............................................................................................................. [131] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [131] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [132] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [139] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [140] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [141]
c) Zwart (third plaintiffs) ............................................................................................................. [148] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [148] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [150] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [153] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [154] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [155]
d) Bryant/Miller (eighth plaintiffs) .............................................................................................. [156] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [156] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [162] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [167] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [177]
e) Wagg (first plaintiff) ................................................................................................................. [189] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [189] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [194] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [195] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [197] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [198]
f) Price/Plum (seventh plaintiffs) ................................................................................................. [201] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [201] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [204] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [205] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [208] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [209]
g) Gould (fifth plaintiffs)............................................................................................................... [210] Sea access................................................................................................................................... [210] The red and yellow roads ........................................................................................................... [214] Purple road................................................................................................................................. [218] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [219]
h) Foley (twelfth plaintiff)............................................................................................................. [220]
Sea access................................................................................................................................... [220]
Purple road................................................................................................................................. [222] Red road ..................................................................................................................................... [223] Yellow road ................................................................................................................................. [224] Relief........................................................................................................................................... [226]
i) Parkins (ninth plaintiffs) ........................................................................................................... [229] Sea access and the purple road .................................................................................................. [229] The red and yellow…
Continue reading Wagg v Squally Cove Forestry Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wagg v Squally Cove Forestry Ltd [2012] NZHC 2763
- Case
- [2012] NZHC 2763
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court determined that the plaintiffs' land was landlocked as they did not have reasonable access to their properties. The court rejected Squally Cove's argument that sea access provided reasonable access, noting that the plaintiffs had always used Bill Bryants Road for vehicular access and had purchased their properties with that access in mind. The court also found that the terms offered by Squally Cove for access over the alternative road were unreasonable, given the history of cooperation among the property owners and Squally Cove's monopolistic position.
The court granted relief to the plaintiffs, ordering a right of way over the red road on specific terms, including conditions for maintenance, formation obligations, and dispute resolution. The court also imposed a condition that the plaintiffs compensate Squally Cove for any damage to its trees during the upgrading of the red road. The court did not order compensation beyond this, finding that the terms offered by Squally Cove were unreasonable and that any increase in property value due to legal access was likely minimal. The court ordered costs on a 2C basis, recognising the complexity of the case due to the number of plaintiffs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.