NOTE: ANY REPORT OF THIS PROCEEDING MUST COMPLY WITH SS 11B, 11C AND 11D OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT 1980. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE SEE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND PALMERSTON NORTH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE PAPAIŌEA ROHE
CIV-2018-454-25
[2018] NZHC 1531
UNDER the Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016 and the Family Court Rules 2002 IN THE MATTER
of an application for judicial review of decisions made under r 429 of the Family Court Rules 2002 and in respect of an
application made refusing use of affidavits filed in Family Court proceedings to be used in criminal proceedings
BETWEEN
W
Applicant
AND
FAMILY COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH
First Respondent
L
Second Respondent
Hearing: 25 June 2018 Counsel:
D A Ewen for Applicant
Appearance for First and Second Respondents excused
Judgment:
25 June 2018
RESULTS JUDGMENT OF THOMAS J
[1] The applicant has sought judicial review of a decision dated 23 February 2018 made under r 429 of the Family Court Rules 2002 and s 11B of the Family Court Act
W v FAMILY COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH [2018] NZHC 1531 [25 June 2018]
1980 refusing access to and use in criminal proceedings of affidavits filed in Family Court proceedings (the Decision).1
[2]I will give a results judgment now with reasons to follow:
(a)I make an order quashing the Decision;
(b)the matter is remitted back to the Registrar of the Family Court at Palmerston North, with the directions that:
(i)under r 429 of the Family Court Rules 2002, the applicant, personally or through counsel, may access the files in the Family Court proceedings, FAM-2015-054-000042 and FAM- 2016-077-000056; and
(ii)the applicant, personally or through counsel, may obtain copies of the documents on the files for use in the criminal proceedings, subject to any directions or rulings of the District Court at trial and, in particular, regarding suppression of the child’s name;
(c)there is no order as to costs.
[3] This order is to lie in Court until the fees in respect of the first amended statement of claim and hearing fees are either waived or paid.
Thomas J
Solicitors:
J H West, Paraparaumu for Applicant
Crown Law, Wellington for First RespondentNgapo-Lipscombe Law, Tokoroa for Second Respondent
1 W v L FC Palmerston North FAM-2015-054-42, 23 February 2018.
- AGLC
- W v Family Court at Palmerston North [2018] NZHC 1531
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 1531
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the Family Court's decision to deny the applicant access to the affidavits was lawful and whether the Family Court had properly exercised its discretion in making the decision. The court had to consider whether the Family Court's ruling was consistent with the purpose of the Family Court Act and the Family Court Rules, and whether there were any errors of law in the decision.
The court found that the Family Court's decision was not in accordance with the law and was therefore quashed. The matter was remitted back to the Family Court with directions that the applicant may access the files in the Family Court proceedings and obtain copies of the documents for use in the criminal proceedings. The court noted that any directions or rulings of the District Court at trial, particularly regarding the suppression of the child's name, must be followed. The court made no order as to costs. This order was to lie in court until the fees in respect of the first amended statement of claim and hearing fees were either waived or paid.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.