Vincent Ross Siemer v Clare O'Brien and Attorney-General

[2015] NZSC 93

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC  32/2015
[2015] NZSC 93

BETWEEN

VINCENT ROSS SIEMER
Applicant

AND

CLARE O'BRIEN
First Respondent

ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Second Respondent

Court:	Elias CJ, William Young and O'Regan JJ
Counsel:	V R Siemer in person D L Harris for First and Second Respondents
Judgment:	26 June 2015

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for recall of the Court’s judgment in Siemer v O’Brien & Anor [2015] NZSC 64 is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. The applicant applies for the recall of our judgment dismissing his application for leave to appeal against a procedural direction made by White J.[1]

   [1]Siemer v O’Brien & Anor [2015] NZSC 64.

2. The application is made on the ground that the judgment misstated the applicant’s proposed appeal ground.

3. We see nothing of substance in the application for recall.  The judgment did not set out in detail the proposed appeal ground because it was not necessary to do so.  There was no material inaccuracy in the judgment and there is no proper basis for it to be recalled.

4. The application for recall is therefore dismissed.

Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for the Respondents