Vincent Ross Siemer v Clare O'Brien and Attorney-General

[2015] NZSC 92

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC 24/2015
[2015] NZSC 92

BETWEEN

VINCENT ROSS SIEMER
Applicant

AND

CLARE O'BRIEN
First Respondent

ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Second Respondent

Court:	Elias CJ, William Young and O'Regan JJ
Counsel:	V R Siemer in person D L Harris for First and Second Respondents
Judgment:	26 June 2015

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for recall of the Court’s judgment in Siemer v O’Brien & Anor [2015] NZSC 63 is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. The applicant applies for the recall of our judgment dismissing his application for leave to appeal a decision of White J.[1]

   [1]Siemer v O’Brien & Anor [2015] NZSC 63.

2. In that judgment, we said the applicant challenged the participation of the second respondent in an appeal to the Court of Appeal (CA 693/2014).[2]  The applicant says this misstated his appeal ground in CA 693/2014 and seeks a correction to set out in detail his argument as to why he challenged the second respondent’s participation.

   [2]At [1].

3. The application raises no point justifying recall of the judgment.  There was no need for the Court to set out in full what the basis on which the challenge to the participation of the second respondent in the appeal was pursued.

4. The application for recall is therefore dismissed.

Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondents