Victoria Key Limited v Bastin HC Tauranga CIV-2011-470-193
[2011] NZHC 590
•17 June 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
CIV-2011-470-193
UNDER the Insolvency Act
BETWEEN VICTORIA KEY LIMITED Judgment Creditor
ANDKEVIN MAURICE BASTIN Judgment Debtor
Hearing: 17 June 2011
Appearances: Ms K McLeish for Judgment Creditor
Mr Bastin in person
Judgment: 17 June 2011
ORAL JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE J P DOOGUE
Sharp Tudhope, Tauranga – by email: [email protected]
Mr Bastin c/o Brian Henry - [email protected]
VICTORIA KEY LIMITED V BASTIN HC TAU CIV-2011-470-193 17 June 2011
[1] Mr Bastin appeared today in response to a summons to debtor. I have some recollection of Mr Bastin’s immediate past history because I presided at one of the the cases that has resulted in his appearance here today. There is no doubt that Mr Bastin has been through an extremely difficult passage in the last few years including the death of his brother who was at one point part of the proceedings which I had to decide. However at the end of the legal process Mr Bastin was adjudged in March of this year to be indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of
$169,534.66 together with other costs. On the 15 March of this year a bankruptcy notice was served on Mr Bastin. Now some three months later matters have proceeded to their inevitable conclusion, one could say, in that an application to adjudicate Mr Bastin has been filed.
[2] The general approach the Court takes is that where an act of bankruptcy as been committed and there is no defence then an applicant is entitled to an order of adjudication. It is not automatic of course and the Court overall must still consider the justice and equity of the case. Sometimes issues of personal background of the creditor and of the motives and conduct of the creditor can be taken into account but generally the recognition is that bankruptcy proceedings are brought not as a debt collection type device but rather are justified by the need to protect the commercial community from those who have not paid their debts. In that context matters of personal background, no matter how unfortunate, and I have no issue at all about the great difficulties Mr Bastin has struggled with recently, will usually be of subsidiary importance.
[3] The judgment has to be taken as having been regularly obtained. The bankruptcy notice provided a warning that if it was not met this exact step which has been taken by the creditor would be taken. In my view this is a case where the Court is required to issue an order of adjudication and that is what I propose to do. Mr Bastin will be adjudicated bankrupt. The creditor will have costs and disbursements.
The order is made at 10.25 a.m.
J P Doogue
Associate Judge
0
0
0