| IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA |
| CA24/2021 [2022] NZCA 394 |
| BETWEEN | GAVIN JOHN TUIRA |
| AND | THE QUEEN |
| Hearing: | 23 February 2022 |
Court: | Courtney, Peters and Cull JJ |
Counsel: | Appellant in person |
Judgment: | 24 August 2022 at 10 am |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
AThe application for an extension of time is granted.
BThe application for leave to appeal is granted.
CThe appeal is allowed.
D The order made under s 24(2)(a) is set aside and substituted with an order under s 25(1)(a). We specify that the order is to be an inpatient order.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Courtney J)
Introduction
Gavin Tuira has struggled with poor mental health his whole life. His engagement with mental health services dates back to the 1970s, and he has a longstanding diagnosis of treatment-resistant paranoid schizophrenia. He also has a large number of previous convictions, including for violent and sexual offending. In 2010 Mr Tuira was living in a boarding house in Hamilton. He was suffering from delusions which caused him to believe that his relationship with the landlady, Ms H, was an intimate one. Mr Tuira formed the view that Ms H had been unfaithful to him. On 2 December 2010 he took a knife from the kitchen and went into Ms H’s bedroom. He punched her at least three times, indecently assaulted her by attempting to pull her pyjama pants off, and threatened her with the knife. He also threatened a second complainant, who had intervened upon hearing the commotion, with the knife. Mr Tuira was charged with aggravated burglary, injuring with intent to injure, indecent assault and assault with a weapon.
In 2012 Mr Tuira was found to be unfit to stand trial by Judge Ruth, and detained as a special patient under s 24(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2011 (CPMIP).[1] In 2013, Mr Tuira was found to be fit to stand trial. He was returned to prison for that purpose. He pleaded guilty to the charges. In 2014, Mr Tuira applied to vacate the guilty pleas, but this application was dismissed.[2] He was sentenced to preventive detention with a minimum period of five years’ imprisonment.[3] In 2017, however, Mr Tuira’s convictions were set aside on appeal and a retrial was ordered.[4] In 2019, following a hearing in the District Court before Judge Cocurullo, Mr Tuira was again found to be unfit to stand trial.[5] Judge Cocurullo made an order that he be detained as a special patient pursuant to s 24(2)(a) of CPMIP.[6]
[1]R v Tuira CRI-2010-019-10002, 13 February 2012 (Ruling 1 of Judge Ruth) [Decision of Judge Ruth] at [22].
[2]R v Tuira DC Hamilton CRI-2010-019-10002, 10 October 2014 [Decision of Judge Gibson].
[3]R v Tuira [2015] NZHC 429 [Sentencing decision].
[4]Tuira v R [2018] NZCA 43 [Court of Appeal judgment].
[5]Police…
Continue reading Tuira v The the Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tuira v The the Queen [2022] NZCA 394
- Case
- [2022] NZCA 394
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court determined that Tuira was mentally disordered, meeting the criteria under the Mental Health Act, as he exhibited delusions and disorders of mood and perception. The court was satisfied, based on the evidence of health assessors, that Tuira required compulsory treatment. The court found that Tuira's condition posed a serious danger to himself and others, and he was unable to take care of himself. Therefore, the court made a compulsory treatment order under the Mental Health Act, specifying it as a community treatment order. The court also stayed the proceedings in which Tuira was found unfit to stand trial, preventing him from being charged again with the same offences during the period of the treatment order.
In light of the findings, the court ordered that Tuira be treated as a patient under the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 and stayed the proceedings against him. The court's decision ensured that Tuira received the necessary treatment for his mental disorder while protecting the public and preventing further legal proceedings for the same offences.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.