Tohu v Police

Case [2021] NZHC 2660


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGĀREI-TERENGA-PARĀOA ROHE

CRI-2021-488-30

CRI-2021-488-31 [2021] NZHC 2660

BETWEEN

RANGI TOHU

Appellant

AND

NEW ZEALAND POLICE

Respondent

Hearing: 6 October 2021

Counsel:

S M Nicholson for appellant T N Fai’ai for respondent

Judgment:

6 October 2021


JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD J


This judgment was delivered by me on 6 October 2021 at 12.30pm

Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:

Solicitors/Counsel:

Stephen Nicholson, Kerikeri for appellant Crown Solicitor, Whangārei for respondent

TOHU v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2021] NZHC 2660 [6 October 2021]

[1]Mr Tohu pleaded guilty to the following charges:

(a)careless driving;1

(b)two of unlawful possession in a public place of a firearm and ammunition;2

(c)driving with excess blood alcohol content;3

(d)reckless driving causing injury;4

(e)assault on a person in a family relationship;5

(f)three of failing to comply with a prohibition given by an enforcement officer.6

[2]                 Mr Tohu was sentenced by Judge Harvey in the District Court at Kaikohe on 2 August 2021 to a total effective end sentence of two years, nine months’ imprisonment and disqualified from driving.7 He appeals against his sentence on the ground that it is manifestly excessive.

Background

[3]The offending occurred on three distinct occasions.

[4]                 First, in the evening of 13 January 2021, Mr Tohu was driving a car on the main street of Kaikohe. On 22 September 2010, he had been forbidden to drive until he obtained a driver licence. While driving the car in Kaikohe, he had crossed the centre line and collided with an oncoming car travelling toward him. The driver of


1      Land Transport Act 1998, s 37(1). Maximum penalty: $3,000 fine and disqualification for such period as court thinks fit.

2      Arms Act 1983, s 51. Maximum penalty: three years’ imprisonment or fine of $4,000 or both.

3      Land Transport Act 1998, s 56(2). Maximum penalty: three months’ imprisonment or fine of

$4,500 and disqualification for six months or more.

4      Land Transport Act 1998, s 36(1)(a). Maximum penalty: five years’ imprisonment or a fine of

$20,000 and disqualification for one year or more.

5      Crimes Act 1961, s 194A. Maximum penalty: two years’ imprisonment.

6      Land Transport Act 1998, s 52(1)(c). Maximum penalty: fine of $10,000.

7      Police v Tohu [2021] NZDC 15705.

that car lost control and crashed into a parked car. Mr Tohu departed the site of the accident. When Police arrived, they searched his car and found a .22 rifle with a round in the chamber. Police subsequently located Mr Tohu in a nearby street. He was on the ground and unresponsive. An evidential blood alcohol test was performed in hospital which returned a result of 198 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood. Mr Tohu pleaded guilty to driving with excess blood alcohol content; careless driving; the firearms charges and being an unlicensed driver who failed to comply with a prohibition from driving.

[5]                 Second, Mr Tohu was seen driving a car near Moerewa on 4 April 2021. He pleaded guilty to being…

Continue reading Tohu v Police

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tohu v Police [2021] NZHC 2660
Case
[2021] NZHC 2660
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tohu appealed against his sentence for a series of serious and violent offending, arguing that it was manifestly excessive. The appeal was heard by Toogood J in the High Court at Whangarei. The only issue on appeal was the starting point for the May 2021 offending, which the appellant argued should have been two years rather than three years. The starting point was necessary to take account of the totality of the offending, including the assault on the injured passenger in hospital. The appeal was dismissed. The sentence was within the available range and not manifestly excessive.

Final orders: The appeal is dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.