The Commissioner of Inland Revenus v Gibson Security Limited HC Wellington CIV 2008-485-1379
[2008] NZHC 2495
•12 August 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV 2008-485-1379
IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Act 1993
BETWEEN THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
Plaintiff
ANDGIBSON SECURITY LIMITED Defendant
Hearing: 12 August 2008
Appearances: A.J. York - Plaintiff
Judgment: 12 August 2008
ORAL JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE D.I. GENDALL
Solicitors: A.J. York, Legal & Technical Services, IRD, PO Box 1462, Wellington
THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V GIBSON SECURITY LIMITED HC WN CIV 2008-485-
1379 12 August 2008
[1] The present liquidation proceeding was called in the list yesterday, 11 August
2008. Mr Latimer appeared for the plaintiff. There was no appearance for the defendant company. A certificate of non-payment of the $175,559.68 debt was provided.
[2] At 10.45 am yesterday, 11 August 2008 an order was made placing the defendant company into liquidation. John Howard Ross Fisk and Craig Alexander Ross Sanson were appointed liquidators.
[3] It now appears from correspondence received late yesterday from the plaintiff, Commissioner of Inland Revenue, that regrettably a matter which should have been before the Court yesterday, 11 August 2008 was not.
[4] It seems that on Friday last, 8 August 2008 an officer of the defendant company made contact with the Inland Revenue Department and offered a favourable settlement proposal. An agreement was apparently reached at that stage between the Commissioner’s solicitor and the defendant company to adjourn this matter for a period of 6 weeks when it was to be called on 11 August 2008 so that this payment could be arranged.
[5] Regrettably, through an administrative error, the plaintiff Commissioner proceeded yesterday, 11 August 2008 and the order placing the defendant company into liquidation was made.
[6] The plaintiff Commissioner now seeks leave to recall this order and a direction adjourning this matter for a period of approximately 6 weeks in order that settlement can be achieved.
[7] It is clear from the decision in Bridon NZ Ltd v Tent World Limited [1992] 3
NZLR 725 that the Court has power to recall a decision wrongly made as an alternative mode of rescinding a winding up order where the Court is satisfied that such order should never have been made. This is pursuant to r. 542 High Court
Rules. Also, the Court’s power to terminate a liquidation on just and equitable grounds under s. 250 Companies Act 1993 has relevance here.
[8] In addition the Court has an inherent jurisdiction to rectify an error which has occurred to otherwise prevent a miscarriage of justice in matters such as the present.
[9] The situation in the present case is, in many respects, not dissimilar to that which prevailed in Bridon NZ Ltd v Tent World Limited. Here it seems that a settlement proposal had been agreed to between the parties prior to the hearing of this matter on 11 August 2008 but that this was overlooked on 11 August 2008 and not referred to the Court.
[10] That said, in my view, this is an appropriate case for the Court to recall the judgment and order made yesterday, 11 August 2008.
[11] An order is now made recalling that judgment and the order placing the defendant company into liquidation dated 11 August 2008.
[12] In its place this proceeding is adjourned to a call in the list at 10.00 am on 6
October 2008.
[13] Costs are reserved.
[14] If it may be relevant this order is timed at 10.31 am today, 12 August 2008.
‘Associate Judge D.I. Gendall’
0
0
1