IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
CRI-2014-409-000019 [2014] NZHC 676
BETWEEN PIERRE JOHN TAUWHARE Appellant
ANDNEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
Hearing: 27 March 2014
Appearances: K J Gray for Appellant
D J Orchard for Respondent
Judgment: 4 April 2014
JUDGMENT OF GENDALL J
Introduction
[1] The appellant appeals against a sentence of two years, nine months imposed by Judge Garland in the District Court on 14 January 2014. The sentence was imposed following guilty pleas on a range of offending undertaken by the appellant, this offending having occurred between July 2013 and September 2013.
[2] The charges for which guilty pleas were entered and the sentences involved were as follows:
(a) One charge of burglary (maximum penalty 10 years’ imprisonment) - sentence of two and a half years imprisonment;
(b) Theft from Monteiths’ Bar (maximum penalty three months’
imprisonment) - sentence of one month imprisonment imposed;
TAUWHARE v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2014] NZHC 676 [4 April 2014]
(c) Theft from Anchor Motel (maximum penalty three months’
imprisonment) - sentence of one month imprisonment imposed;
(d) One charge of reckless driving (maximum penalty three months’
imprisonment, $4500 fine with minimum six months disqualification)
- sentence of two months imprisonment imposed and one year disqualification from driving;
(e) One charge of failing to stop (maximum penalty six months’ disqualification and $10,000 fine) - sentence of three months’ disqualification (cumulative) imposed;
(f) One charge of possession of an offensive weapon, namely a knife (maximum penalty three months’ imprisonment) - sentence of two months’ imprisonment imposed (cumulative);
(g)One charge of giving false alarm - sentence of one month imprisonment imposed (cumulative);
(h)One charge of theft from Kmart (maximum penalty three months’ imprisonment) - sentence of one month imprisonment imposed (concurrent);
(i)Two charges of wilful trespass (maximum penalty three months’ imprisonment), two charges of assault (maximum penalty one year imprisonment), one charge of wilful damage (maximum penalty three months imprisonment) and one charge of breach of District Court bail
- one month imprisonment imposed (concurrent).
The facts
[3] The facts of the offending range over a number of matters and are quite detailed. They are set out at paragraphs [2] – [9] of Judge Garland’s sentencing notes in the District Court. In light of the magnitude of the offending involved here
it is useful for the purposes of this appeal to set out those facts in full here which I
now do:
[2] What you did that has caused you to come before the Court today is as follows: At about 10.30 am on Tuesday 2 July last year you were at the Salvation Army offices, Crawford Street, Dunedin where you had been working as a volunteer for approximately three years. You entered the gymnasium area where a group of women were playing volley ball. You asked to join in the game but your request was declined. So you stood and watched. The woman concerned approached you and asked that you leave the area. You apparently took umbrage at that because what you…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Tauwhare v Police and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] NZHC 676
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.