IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
CIV-2015-470-188 [2016] NZHC 1747
UNDER the Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 BETWEEN
TAURANGA BRIDGE MARINA LTD Plaintiff
AND
NEVILLE JOHN DU FALL, JANET LOUISE DU FALL AND RUSSELL FREDERICK DU FALL as trustees of N.J Du Fall Family Trust
First Defendants
AND
CHRISTOPHER DENNIS DONALD COLLIER AND CA TRUSTEES (2012) LTD as trustees of Chris Collier Family Trust
Second Defendants
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
Hearing: 11 July 2016 Appearances:
A Hopkinson for the Plaintiff
N J Russell and S I Jones for the DefendantsJudgment:
29 July 2016
JUDGMENT OF THOMAS J
This judgment was delivered by me on 29 July 2016 at 4.30 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:………………………….
TAURANGA BRIDGE MARINA LTD v DU FALL, DU FALL AND DU FALL & ORS [2016] NZHC 1747 [29
July 2016]
AND RUSSELL JOHN LEVY
Third Defendant
AND
STUART JAMES NEAVE Fourth Defendant
AND
STUART JAMES NEAVE AND SUE CELS
Fifth Defendants
AND
ALLARD ROBERT HENRY MITCHELL AND CLAYTON ROBERT HENRY MITCHELL as trustees of Bob Mitchell Sixth Defendants
AND
COLIN GRAHAM Seventh Defendant
Introduction
[1] This case involves the proposed construction of a breakwater at a marina in Mount Maunganui, Tauranga (the breakwater). The plaintiff, Tauranga Bridge Marina Limited (Tauranga Bridge), owns and manages the marina, which was developed pursuant to a statutory scheme under the Securities Act 1978. It claims that the defendants, who each own licences to berths at the marina, have wrongly refused to make contributions toward the costs of construction of the breakwater, in contravention of an extraordinary resolution passed on 15 December 2014 by the berth licence holders (the Resolution).
Facts
[2] The marina contains 496 berths, of which 306 are subject to berth licences (licences). The remainder of the berths are owned and operated by Tauranga Bridge. The licences give the right to berth a nominated vessel in the holder’s berth at the marina and to use the marina’s structures and facilities.
[3] The marina was created in 1996 pursuant to a scheme under the Securities Act 1978 (the Scheme). Securities were offered to the public under the Scheme pursuant to the following:
(a) The Securities Act 1978 and Securities Regulations 1983.
(b) Tauranga Bridge’s Prospectus dated April 1996 (the Prospectus).
(c) The Securities Act (Tauranga Bridge Marina Limited) Exemption
Notice 1996.
(d) The Fundholding Deed dated 10 May 1996.
(e) The Tauranga Bridge Marina Management Trust Deed dated 10 May
1996 (the Management Deed).
[4] The Fundholding Deed was entered into between Tauranga Bridge as issuer of the securities offered to the public and the Public Trust as the fundholder. Tauranga Bridge funded the construction of the marina from monies received as subscriptions for preference shares. Monies paid by applicants for the preference shares were held on trust by the Public Trust under the terms of the Fundholding Deed. The preference shares were redeemed for licences on completion of construction of the marina. Although the marina and its assets were…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Tauranga Bridge Marina Ltd v Du Fall and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NZHC 1747
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.