Tapsell v The the Queen
[2022] NZHC 398
•28 February 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTEPOTI ROHE
CRI-2021-412-51
[2022] NZHC 398
UNDER the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 IN THE MATTER
of an appeal against sentence
BETWEEN
RYAN KARL TAPSELL
Appellant
AND
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Hearing: 28 February 2022 Counsel:
D Henderson for Appellant R P Bates for Respondent
Judgment:
28 February 2022
JUDGMENT OF OSBORNE J
(result)
This judgment was delivered by me on 9 March 2022 at 9.30 am
Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:
TAPSELL v R [2022] NZHC 398 [28 February 2022]
[1] Ryan Tapsell was sentenced in the District Court on a charge of assault,1 one charge of assault on a person in a family relationship,2 and a representative charge of contravening a protection order.3 He pleaded guilty to those charges, while the Police withdrew a number of other charges.
[2] On 7 December 2021 Judge M B T Turner sentenced Mr Tapsell to two years four months’ imprisonment on the charge of contravening a protection order, with concurrent sentences of seven months’ imprisonment for assault in a family relationship and three months’ imprisonment for assault (the sentencing).4 A protection order was also made against Mr Tapsell.5
[3] Mr Tapsell appeals the sentence on the basis the Judge erred by giving insignificant discounts for mitigating factors, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence. He also appealed the imposition of the protection order.
Outcome
[4]Having heard submissions, I dismiss the appeal. My reasons will follow.
Osborne J
Solicitors:
Crown Solicitor, Dunedin
Copy to: D Henderson, Barrister, Dunedin
1 Crimes Act 1961, s 196: maximum penalty one years’ imprisonment.
2 Section 194A: maximum penalty two years’ imprisonment.
3 Family Violence Act 2018, ss 90(a), 9 and 112(1)(a): maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment.
4 R v Tapsell [2021] NZDC 24189.
5 Under Sentencing Act 2002, s 123B.
0
0