IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2013-485-6758 [2014] NZHC 730
BETWEEN JOHN RUSSELL STRAHL as Trustee of
the O T GOUGH FAMILY TRUST Plaintiff
AND
ALEXANDER MALCOLM McKINNON, JOHN RUSSELL
STRAHL, ANTONY THOMAS GOUGH, TRACY OWEN GOUGH, AVENAL BERYL ELIZABETH McKINNON, LISA ANGELIQUE D’HARCOURT GOUGH, WYNTON GILL COX, NICHOLAS RICHARD WILLIAM DAVIDSON, HARCOURT DAVID GOUGH, JAMES TRACY GOUGH, RACHEL CORALIE KOOPMAN-GOUGH, MATTHEW OWEN McKINNON, SOPHIA AVENAL
ANNA McKINNON, GINA LOUSE SATTERTHWAITE, BENJAMIN THOMAS GOUGH, FIFE HOLDINGS LIMITED
First Defendants
GOUGH HOLDINGS LIMITED Second Defendant
Hearing: 2 April 2014 Counsel:
R J Fowler QC for Plaintiff
A V Foote for Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Sixteenth-named First
Defendants in support of the application
J W A Johnson for First and Fifth-named First DefendantsJ A Farmer QC and P Robertson for Third, Fourth, and Ninth- named First Defendants
B D Gray QC for Head Trustees in proceeding CIV-2012-404-
3798 (Auckland Registry)Judgment:
9 April 2014
RESERVED JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE SMITH
STRAHL v McKINNON AND ORS [2014] NZHC 730 [9 April 2014]
[1] The fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth–named first defendants (the applicants) seek orders transferring this proceeding (the Wellington proceeding) to the Auckland Registry of the High Court, and directing that the Wellington proceeding be heard after proceeding CIV-2012-404-3798 (the Directions proceeding) which is pending in the Auckland Registry of the High Court. The applicants also seek a direction that the Wellington proceeding be heard by the same judge who hears the Directions proceeding.
[2] Both the Wellington proceeding and the Directions proceeding affect a number of the same parties, who are descendants of the late T T Gough, who died in the 1950s. T T Gough established the well known New Zealand company Gough Gough and Hamer Ltd in 1929.
[3] Under his last will (and a series of codicils), T T Gough established various trusts. The main trust assets were shares in Gough Gough and Hamer Limited. The beneficiaries in the estate of T T Gough were the deceased’s children and grandchildren. All of T T Gough’s children are now deceased. The surviving beneficiaries are the third, fourth, fifth, and ninth–named first defendants, being the children of T T Gough’s son Owen, and the fourteen and fifteenth–named first defendants, being the children of T T Gough’s son Blair. For convenient reference, the children of Blair Gough have so far been referred to in the Wellington proceeding as the “B T Gough parties”, and the children of Owen Gough (and certain of the children of the fourth, fifth and ninth defendants) have been referred to as the “O T Gough parties”.
[4] The trusts established in the estate of T T Gough were varied by Deed of Family Arrangement dated 4 October 1962, and by a reorganisation which occurred in 1986 through 1987. The reorganisation dealt with a range of matters, including difficulties in the administration of the trusts and the management of Gough Gough and Hamer Ltd. A series of deeds and agreements were approved by the High…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Strahl v McKinnon and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] NZHC 730
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.