IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2013-404-002282 [2013] NZHC 2295
BETWEEN SPINNAKER CAPITAL LIMITED Plaintiff AND
JEFF MOSS Defendant
Hearing: 20 August 2013 Appearances:
S Grant for Plaintiff
D Hurd for DefendantJudgment:
4 September 2013
JUDGMENT OF WOOLFORD J
This judgment was delivered by me on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 3.00 pm pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Counsel: S Grant, Auckland
Stewart Germann Law Office, Auckland
SPINNAKER CAPITAL LIMITED v MOSS [2013] NZHC 2295 [4 September 2013]
Introduction
[1] Spinnaker Capital Limited (Spinnaker) applies for summary judgment against
Jeffrey Moss (Mr Moss) to enforce a personal guarantee that he gave for a loan of
$2,052,000 advanced on 17 March 2011 by Spinnaker to Peacock Street Trust Limited (PSTL) as trustee of the Peacock Street (No 2) Trust (the loan). The loan was secured by registered first mortgages over numbers 15, 23 and 25 Peacock Street, Glendowie, and a registered general security agreement over all present and after acquired property of the borrower.
[2] The purpose of the loan was to refinance existing debt. On 12 May 2010, Spinnaker had advanced a loan of $2,010,000 (which included an establishment fee of $110,000) to Moss Auckland Trust Limited (MATL). The loan to MATL was repaid by the loan to PSTL on 17 March 2011. The term of the loan to PSTL was less than two months, with the repayment date being 13 May 2011. The interest rate was 10 per cent per annum with a default rate of 15 per cent per annum above the interest rate.
[3] The loan was not repaid on 13 May 2011. Four and a half months later, on
29 September 2011, the repayment date was extended to 13 February 2012. A further fee of $130,000 was added to the loan as of 1 August 2011 and incurred interest accordingly. At that time, the loan facility was said to be $2,362,000, which included capitalised interest of $82,000. The interest rate remained unchanged but five per cent of the interest was to be paid monthly, with the balance of five per cent interest being added to the loan and itself incurring interest. The loan was to be further secured by an unregistered second mortgage over Levels 1-4, 233 Queen Street, Auckland (the Strand property), with a priority of $450,000 plus costs and interest.
[4] The loan was not repaid on 13 February 2012. Three months later, on
18 April 2012, the repayment date was extended to 30 June 2012. A further fee of
$100,000 was added to the loan as of 31 March 2012 and incurred interest accordingly. At that time, the loan facility was said to be $2,450,000 plus interest. It was also agreed that interest was to be paid “in monthly payments and at the rate of
$10,000 per month”. The priority in respect of the unregistered mortgage over the
Strand property was increased to $1,000,000 plus costs and interest.
[5] The loan was not…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Spinnaker v Moss and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] NZHC 2295
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.