Singliworld Pte Limited v Registrar of Companies

Case [2016] NZHC 628


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2016-404-470 [2016] NZHC 628

UNDER the Companies Act 1993

IN THE MATTER

of an application for an order that a company, United Markets Limited, not be removed from the Companies Register

BETWEEN

SINGLIWORLD PTE LIMITED Applicant

AND

THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES Respondent

Hearing: 11 April 2016

Counsel:

HP Holland for applicant
No appearance for respondent

Judgment:

11 April 2016

(ORAL) JUDGMENT OF FAIRE J

This judgment was delivered by me on 11 April 2016 at 10:08 am pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

Date……………

Solicitors:           Simpson Lawyers, Auckland (S Tong)

Singliworld PTE Limited v The Registrar of Companies [2016] NZHC 628 [11 April 2016]

[1]      The applicant seeks an order pursuant to s 323 of the Companies Act 1993 that Union Markets Ltd not be removed from the Company Register.

[2]     A notice from the Registrar of Companies discloses that the Registrar commenced the removal from the register process because Union Markets Ltd had failed to file its annual return.

[3]      Moore J granted the applicant leave to bring this application by originating application on 16 March 2016.  The application has been served on the Registrar of Companies.  The Registrar has accepted the applicant’s objection to the removal of Union Markets Ltd from the Companies Register and has required this application to be made.

[4]      The Registrar of Companies advises that the Registrar abides the decision of the court in relation to this application.

[5]      A search of Union Markets Ltd discloses that its directors are in Cyprus and Australia.  The only shareholder is the director who resides in Cyprus.  I am satisfied that little would be gained, in this case, by directing service on the shareholder and directors,  having  regard  to  the  failure  to  comply  with  the  provisions  of  the Companies Act.

Background facts

[6]      Union Markets Ltd was trading as a foreign exchange dealer.  The applicant’s

director, Leong Koon Wah, has filed an affidavit which discloses that:

a)       The  applicant  is  a  Singaporean  company  trading  as  a  foreign exchange introducing broker;

b)Union Markets Ltd was a financial service provider trading in foreign exchange until it was deregistered by the Financial Markets Authority on 26 September 2015;

c)       The applicant company introduced customers to Union Markets Ltd and placed the customers’ funds in accounts with Union Markets Ltd; and

d)Following the deregistration the applicant requested Union Markets Ltd to close all its customers’ accounts and refund all funds.  Funds amounting to US$15,844,734 remain outstanding.

[7]      I am satisfied that the jurisdictional requirements for the making of an order in this case have been met.

[8]      The application is made in reliance on s 321 of the Companies Act 1993. The relevant parts of that section for the purposes of this application are the following:

321        Objection to removal from register

(1)       Where a notice is given of an intention to remove a company from the New Zealand register, any person may deliver to the Registrar, not later than the date specified in the notice, an objection to the removal on any one or more of the following grounds:

(d)      That the person is a creditor, or a shareholder, or a person who has an undischarged claim against the company;

[9]      Section 323 of the Companies Act 1993 provides

323        Powers of Court

(1)       A person who gives a notice objecting to the removal of a company from the New Zealand register  on a ground specified in  section

321(1)(d), (e), or (f) of this Act may apply to the Court for an order

that the company not be removed from the register on any ground set out in that subsection.

(2)        On an application for an order under subsection (1) of this section, the Court may, if it is satisfied that the company should not be removed from the register on any of those grounds, make an order that the company is not to be removed from the register.

[10]     I am satisfied that the discretion conferred on the court by s 323(2) of the Companies Act may be exercised by making the orders sought.  The applicant does have an undischarged claimed Union Markets Ltd.

Orders

[11]     I order that:

a)        Union  Markets  Ltd  shall  not  be  removed  from  the  New  Zealand

Register of Companies; and

b)A sealed copy of this order shall be lodged with the Registrar of Companies  and  shall  be served  on  the registered office  of Union Markets Ltd, namely Plaza Level, Regus, 41 Shortland Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

Costs

[12]     Costs are reserved.  I record at this stage that the question of costs may not be able to be resolved until a proceeding is issued against Union Markets Ltd.  For that

reason, no further direction is made at this time.

JA Faire J

Details
AGLC
Singliworld Pte Limited v Registrar of Companies [2016] NZHC 628
Case
[2016] NZHC 628
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Singliworld Pte Limited v Registrar of Companies involves an application by Singliworld Pte Limited to prevent the removal of Union Markets Limited from the Companies Register. The Registrar of Companies had initiated the process of removing Union Markets Limited due to its failure to file an annual return. Singliworld Pte Limited, which is a Singaporean company and a creditor of Union Markets Limited, filed an objection to the removal and subsequently sought an order under section 323 of the Companies Act 1993 to prevent the removal of Union Markets Limited from the register. The court had to decide whether the applicant had grounds to prevent the removal and whether the court had the discretion to make the requested order.

The court examined the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 1993, specifically sections 321 and 323, to determine if Singliworld Pte Limited had a valid undischarged claim against Union Markets Limited, which would allow for an objection to the removal. It was noted that Singliworld Pte Limited had introduced customers to Union Markets Limited and had placed funds in accounts with it. Following the deregistration of Union Markets Limited, Singliworld Pte Limited requested the closure of all customer accounts and the refund of funds, which amounted to US$15,844,734 and remain outstanding. The court found that Singliworld Pte Limited did indeed have an undischarged claim against Union Markets Limited, satisfying the requirements of section 321(1)(d) of the Companies Act 1993.

Given the findings, the court exercised its discretion under section 323(2) of the Companies Act 1993 and made an order that Union Markets Limited shall not be removed from the New Zealand Register of Companies. The court also directed that a sealed copy of the order be lodged with the Registrar of Companies and served on the registered office of Union Markets Limited.

In conclusion, the court granted the relief sought by Singliworld Pte Limited and ordered that Union Markets Limited shall not be removed from the New Zealand Register of Companies. The matter of costs was reserved, with the court noting that the issue may not be resolved until a proceeding is issued against Union Markets Limited.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.