Silich v White
[2019] NZHC 729
•8 April 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV 2017-443-17
[2019] NZHC 729
BETWEEN PAUL SILICH, LARRY CROW, CONRAD O’CARROLL AND PATRICIA
O’CARROLL as four of the current trustees of the Te Runanga o Ngati TrustFirst Plaintiff
AND
NGATI TAMA CUSTODIAN TRUSTEE LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
HOMESOFT GROUP PTY LIMITED
Third PlaintiffSITU SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED
Fourth PlaintiffLISA WHITE
First DefendantTAHUATA WHITE
Second DefendantADRIAN WHITE
Third DefendantALLEN WHITE
Fourth DefendantDENISE TINNEY
Fifth Defendant
Hearing: On the papers Judgment:
8 April 2019
COSTS JUDGMENT OF DUFFY J
SILICH & ORS v WHITE & ORS [2019] NZHC 729 [8 April 2019]
This judgment was delivered by me on 8 April 2019 at 3.00 pm pursuant to
Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/ Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Anthony Harper, Auckland
[1] The plaintiffs proceeded against the fourth defendant in this proceeding by way of formal proof. The plaintiffs were successful and obtained judgment against the fourth defendant. The plaintiffs now seeks costs against the fourth defendant.
[2] The general principle is that costs follow the event. Here, the plaintiffs have been successful and seek costs at category 2B for the steps they have taken in the proceeding. I am satisfied that the appropriate category for this proceeding is category 2 and that the appropriate band for the steps the plaintiff has taken in the proceeding is band B. The plaintiffs quantify the category 2B costs as $12,277.00. I accept their calculation.
[3] The plaintiffs also seeks disbursements of $1,350 for filing its initiating document and $200 for filing the without notice interlocutory application, such disbursements coming to a total of $1,550. I am satisfied the plaintiffs are entitled to the disbursements they seek.
Result
[4] The plaintiffs are awarded costs in the sum of $12,277.00 and disbursements in the sum of $1,550.
Duffy J
0
0
0