IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2012-485-2419
CIV-2012-485-2546 [2014] NZHC 265
BETWEEN VINCENT ROSS SIEMER
Plaintiff
AND
JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER
First Defendant
OTHERS
Second to Sixth Defendants
On the papers Counsel:
Plaintiff in person
L Theron for First Defendant
Second to Sixth Defendants abideJudgment:
25 February 2014
FURTHER JUDGMENT OF WILLIAMS J (COSTS)
[1] On 2 July 2013 I struck out two proceedings brought by Mr Siemer as an abuse of process and awarded indemnity costs against him.1
[2] The first defendant is seeking costs to the sum of $10,655.97 as follows: (a) $10,125 in legal costs;
(b) $483.40 in filing fees; and
(c) $47.57 in photocopying and binding costs.
SIEMER v JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER (COSTS) [2014] NZHC 265 [25 February 2014]
[3] A table was attached to counsel’s memorandum verifying that time spent on this was greater than the amount actually claimed.
[4] I am satisfied that all items claimed are properly claimable and certify the claimed amount as payable by Mr Siemer accordingly.
Williams J
Solicitors:
Gault Mitchell Law, Wellington
Cc: V Siemer
27 Clansman Terrace
Gulf Harbour 0930
- AGLC
- Siemer v Judicial Conduct Commissioner [2014] NZHC 265
- Case
- [2014] NZHC 265
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the Judicial Conduct Commissioner was entitled to recover the costs claimed from Siemer. The court had to determine if the costs claimed were reasonable and properly incurred, and if the strike-out was justified.
The court found that the Judicial Conduct Commissioner was entitled to recover the costs claimed. The court was satisfied that all items claimed were properly claimable and certified the claimed amount as payable by Siemer. The court noted that the time spent on the proceedings was greater than the amount claimed, and thus found the claimed amount to be reasonable.
The court ordered Siemer to pay the Judicial Conduct Commissioner the sum of $10,655.97 in costs. This included $10,125 in legal costs, $483.40 in filing fees, and $47.57 in photocopying and binding costs. The court also noted that the amount claimed was verified by a table attached to counsel's memorandum.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.