Siemer v Brown

[2015] NZSC 86

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC 31/2015
[2015] NZSC 86

BETWEEN

VINCENT ROSS SIEMER AND JANE DINSDALE SIEMER
Applicants

AND

KEVIN STANLEY BROWN
First Respondent

M PALMA
Second Respondent

A LOVELOCK
Third Respondent

JANE THEW
Fourth Respondent

REECE SIRL
Fifth Respondent

Continued next page …

Court:	William Young, Arnold and OʼRegan JJ
Counsel:	V R Siemer in person A M Powell and E J Devine for First to Fourteenth Respondents V E Casey for Fifteenth Respondent
Judgment:	22 June 2015

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for the recall of our judgment in Siemer & Siemer v Brown & Ors [2015] NZSC 62 is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

JULIE FOSTER

Sixth Respondent

JOHN MILLER

Seventh Respondent

DAVID THOMAS

Eighth Respondent

BRETT OTTO

Ninth Respondent

TREVOR FRANKLIN

Tenth Respondent

JOHN TAYLOR

Eleventh Respondent

JUERGEN ARNDT

Twelfth Respondent

KERWIN STEWART

Thirteenth Respondent

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND

Fourteenth Respondent

B J REID

Fifteenth Respondent

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. The first named applicant seeks an order recalling our judgment of 15 May 2015 dismissing his application for leave to appeal against a judgment by Wild J[1] refusing to dispense with security for costs in relation to an appeal by the applicant to the Court of Appeal against a refusal by Toogood J to recuse himself in litigation in the High Court in a claim by the applicants as plaintiffs against the respondents.[2]

   [1]Siemer v Brown [2015] NZCA 69.

   [2]Siemer v Brown [2014] NZHC 3175.

2. The grounds advanced do not add anything of substance to the submissions filed in support of the leave judgment and do not warrant a recall of that judgment.

Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondents