IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
CIV-2022-485-168
[2022] NZHC 3270
BETWEEN VINCENT ROSS SIEMER
Plaintiff
AND
ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND
Defendant
On the Papers Counsel:
Plaintiff self-represented
D Harris and R Lawrie for the Defendants
Judgment:
7 December 2022
JUDGMENT OF GWYN J
(Costs)
[1] Mr Siemer filed this proceeding by way of statement of claim dated 4 April 2022. The claim sought declarations and compensation for alleged breaches by the Supreme Court of Mr Siemer’s rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Mr Siemer’s claim was amended on 8 June 2022.
[2] The Attorney-General filed a statement of defence dated 23 May 2022. No amendment was filed in response to the amended statement of claim because those amendments concerned matters of relief only.
[3] On 3 June 2022, the Attorney-General filed an application to strike out the statement of claim. The proceeding was to have been heard before me on 5 October 2022 but, by agreement, I determined it on the papers.
SIEMER v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2022] NZHC 3270 [7 December 2022]
[4] On 27 October 2022, I struck out the proceedings, directed the removal of the Supreme Court as the second defendant and found that the Attorney-General was entitled to costs on a 2B basis.1
[5] I directed that any memoranda as to costs and disbursements be filed by the Attorney-General by 10 November 2022 and by Mr Siemer by 24 November 2022.2
[6] I have now received a costs memorandum for the Attorney-General dated 9 November 2022. No memorandum has been received from Mr Siemer.
[7] The Attorney-General advises that costs and disbursements on a 2B basis would total $15,109.43. However, r 14.2(1)(f) of the High Court Rules 2016 provides that an award of costs should not exceed the costs incurred by the party claiming costs. Accordingly, the Attorney-General seeks actual costs and disbursements in the sum of
$10,900.03, as detailed in counsel’s schedule.
[8] I direct that costs and disbursements are payable by the plaintiff to the Attorney-General in the total sum of $10,900.03, in accordance with the schedule of costs filed by counsel for the Attorney-General.
Gwyn J
Solicitors:
Crown Law, Wellington
Copy to:
Mr Siemer, Orewa
1 Siemer v Attorney-General [2022] NZHC 2789 at [26] and [59].
2 At [60].
- AGLC
- Siemer v Attorney-General [2022] NZHC 3270
- Case
- [2022] NZHC 3270
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Mr Siemer's claim was valid and whether the Supreme Court had indeed breached his rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The court was also required to determine whether the proceedings should be struck out and if the Attorney-General was entitled to costs. The court's reasoning involved a detailed examination of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the High Court Rules 2016, and the merits of the claim. The court found that the proceedings were without merit and should be struck out, and that the Attorney-General was entitled to costs on a 2B basis.
The High Court, in its judgment, struck out the proceedings and directed the removal of the Supreme Court as a defendant. The court found that the Attorney-General was entitled to costs on a 2B basis. The court directed that any memoranda as to costs and disbursements be filed by the Attorney-General by 10 November 2022 and by Mr Siemer by 24 November 2022. The Attorney-General provided a costs memorandum, while Mr Siemer did not. The court then directed that costs and disbursements were payable by the plaintiff to the Attorney-General in the total sum of $10,900.03, in accordance with the schedule of costs filed by counsel for the Attorney-General.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.