NOTE: PURSUANT TO S 139 OF THE CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004, ANY REPORT OF THIS PROCEEDING MUST COMPLY WITH SS 11B, 11C AND 11D OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT 1980. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE SEE
HTTPS://WWW.JUSTICE.GOVT.NZ/FAMILY/ABOUT/RESTRICTION-ON- PUBLISHING-JUDGMENTS.
ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES AND THE CHILDREN.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2018-404-001137
[2019] NZHC 1015
BETWEEN SG
Plaintiff
AND
DSG
Defendant
Hearing: 8 May 2019 Counsel:
M A Twentyman for the Plaintiff A Hansen for the Defendant
U Patel and S N N Singh for the Children H J Ellis for Oranga Tamariki
Judgment:
10 May 2019
JUDGMENT OF EDWARDS J
This judgment was delivered by me on , 2019 at am/pm pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Counsel: A Hansen, Auckland
U Patel, Auckland
S N N Singh, Auckland H J Ellis, Auckland
Solicitors: Morrison Kent, Wellington
SG v DSG [2019] NZHC 1015 [10 May 2019]
[1] By judgment dated 20 February 2019, I made interim orders placing the children of the parties under the guardianship of the High Court of New Zealand pending the determination of the substantive proceeding or further order of the Court.1 The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children (Oranga Tamariki) was appointed agent of the Court to facilitate the return of the children to New Zealand.
[2] There have been difficulties in enforcing the interim orders and the children have not yet been returned. The father is now in India and appears to have assumed custody of the children. He has not indicated any intention to return the children to New Zealand, and, as at the date of the hearing, the children’s whereabouts is unknown. The mother has not commenced proceedings in India to enforce my judgment and wishes to explore other avenues before taking that step as a last resort.
[3] Counsel for the mother, Oranga Tamariki, and for the children, seek orders to be made by consent to facilitate the return of the children, and to provide further direction on the steps to be taken by Oranga Tamariki on their return. Counsel for the father has indicated that he does not agree to the orders sought but “leaves the matter in the hands of the Court”.
The orders sought
[4] The terms of the orders sought with the consent of the parties (except for the father) were set out in a handwritten document provided at the end of the hearing.
[5] Some of the orders sought require the father to return the children to New Zealand and take steps to facilitate their return such as assisting with obtaining passports and making necessary travel arrangements. Other orders set out the steps that the mother and Oranga Tamariki will take to assist in obtaining passports for the children.
[6] I am satisfied that orders requiring the father to…
Continue reading SG v DSG
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- SG v DSG [2019] NZHC 1015
- Case
- [2019] NZHC 1015
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to make orders that would compel DSG to return the children to New Zealand and assist in their travel arrangements, as well as to clarify the roles of the mother and Oranga Tamariki upon the children's return. The Court considered the need for such orders based on the father's non-compliance with previous interim orders and the urgency of ensuring the children's return to New Zealand.
The Court found that compelling DSG to return the children was appropriate, given his non-compliance with the interim orders and his apparent assumption of custody in India. The Court accepted that detailed orders regarding the steps to be taken by the mother and Oranga Tamariki upon the children's return were unnecessary, as they had already agreed on a process for obtaining passports and facilitating travel. However, the Court invited the parties to provide further clarity on the children's placement and the roles of the mother and Oranga Tamariki post-return. The Court decided to issue specific orders to compel DSG to return the children and assist in their travel arrangements.
The Court ordered DSG to take all reasonable steps to return the children to New Zealand, including sending passport photos and making travel arrangements. The Court also required the parties to submit a joint memorandum addressing the children's placement and any amendments to the interim orders. These orders were intended to ensure the children's safe return and to clarify the responsibilities of the mother and Oranga Tamariki upon the children's return to New Zealand.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.