Sam's Fukuyama Food Services Limited v Zhang

Case

[2011] NZCA 464

19 September 2011


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
CA325/2011
[2011] NZCA 464

BETWEEN  SAM'S FUKUYAMA FOOD SERVICES LIMITED
Applicant

AND  JIAN ZHANG
Respondent

Hearing:         13 September 2011

Court:             O'Regan P, Harrison and Stevens JJ

Counsel:         S C Dench for Applicant
G M Pollak for Respondent

Judgment:      19 September 2011 at 3.00 pm

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Leave to appeal is granted on the following question of law:

Whether the Judge in the Employment Court failed to exercise the discretionary power in s 128(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 when awarding compensation for remuneration lost by the employee and, if so, what is the appropriate sum payable to the employee in the exercise of such discretion?

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS OF THE COURT

(Given by Stevens J)

Introduction

  1. At the conclusion of the hearing of the application for leave to argue a question of law under s 214 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act), we advised the parties that we proposed to grant leave on the question of law set out above.

  2. In order to minimise the costs to the parties in respect of the appeal, counsel agreed that the substantive appeal could be dealt with on the papers.  To assist the Court further, and to provide any submissions additional to those canvassed in argument at the hearing, counsel will each provide further written submissions of not more than three pages.  Such submissions will be directed to the factors that ought to be considered in the exercise of the discretion under s 128(3) of the Act to award a sum greater than an amount equal to three months ordinary time remuneration as provided in s 128(2) of the Act.

  3. The applicant is to file and serve its submissions by 4 October 2011 with the respondent to answer by 11 October 2011.  There is no provision for a reply by the applicant.

  4. As discussed at the hearing, the parties are encouraged to endeavour to resolve their differences by agreement.  But if the parties have not otherwise resolved the amount of remuneration in excess of three months ordinary time remuneration payable to the applicant, a judgment fixing the amount payable will be issued by the Court.

Solicitors:
M J Burney, Auckland for Applicant

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0