IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTEPOTI ROHE
CIV-2023-412-11
[2023] NZHC 1411
UNDER section 52 of the Trustee Act 1956 IN THE MATTER
of the EJM FAMILY TRUST
AND
IN THE MATTER
of an application by JESSICA RUTH RODLEY and WARWICK JAMES GRAHAM
Applicants
Hearing: On the papers Counsel:
A M McCormick and Q D H de Hamel for Applicants
Judgment:
7 June 2023
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE PAULSEN
This judgment was delivered by me on 7 June 2023 at 4.00 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:
RE RODLEY (EJM FAMILY TRUST) [2023] NZHC 1411 [7 June 2023]
[1]There is before me an application for:
(a)leave to commence a proceeding seeking a vesting order by way of originating application under pt 19 of the High Court Rules 2016; and
(b)an order vesting a property situated at 40 Main Street, Weston in the names of Jessica Rodley (Jessica) and Warwick Graham (Warwick) as the current trustees of the EJM Family Trust.
[2] Jessica and Warwick are the current trustees of the EJM Family Trust. The trust was formerly known as the Lawry Family Trust and was created by a deed of trust dated 25 November 2004.
[3] The settlors of the Trust were Peter Lawry (Peter) and Sarah Lawry (Sarah), and the original trustees were Sarah and Malley & Co Trustees Ltd. The primary beneficiaries of the trust were the settlors and their children.
[4] The trust assets include a property at 40 Main Street, Weston recorded in record of title OT91/263. The current registered owners are Sarah and Malley & Co Trustees Ltd. Although there have been several changes of trustees over the years, the changes were not all recorded on the title to the property. The failure to change the registration was an administrative error.
[5]The changes of trustees were as follows:
(a)by deed dated 31 January 2019, Sarah was removed as trustee and Mike Buchanan appointed as a trustee in her place;
(b)by deed dated May 2020, Malley & Co Trustees Ltd was removed as a trustee and Jessica appointed in its place; and
(c)by deed dated 29 July 2022, Mike Buchanan was removed as a trustee and replaced by Warwick.
[6]Peter was removed a beneficiary of the trust in 2007.
[7] Sarah was removed as a trustee because she lacked mental capacity, and she has recently passed away.
[8] Jessica and Warwick are seeking an order pursuant to s 52(2) or (3) of the Trustee Act 1956 to have the Main Street property vested in them as the current trustees, because that is required for administrative purposes and they recognise their responsibilities and duties as trustees and wish to ensure compliance with those duties.
[9] All of the children of Peter and Sarah are aware of this application and consent to it. There are no other known beneficiaries of the trust.
Leave to use the originating application process
[10] The proposed…
Continue reading Rodley (EJM Family Trust)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Rodley (EJM Family Trust) [2023] NZHC 1411
- Case
- [2023] NZHC 1411
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court were whether leave should be granted to commence the proceeding by way of an originating application and whether a vesting order should be made. The Court found that the use of the originating application process was appropriate in this case as it was a purely administrative matter and there was no opposition. The Court also considered that the vesting order was necessary to ensure the property was correctly vested in the names of the current trustees. The Court concluded that the applicants were validly appointed as trustees and the vesting order was appropriate to ensure compliance with their duties.
The Court granted the applicants leave to commence the proceeding by way of an originating application and dispensed with service of the application. The Court also granted the application for a vesting order and made an order that the property at 40 Main Street, Weston vest in the names of Jessica Ruth Rodley and Warwick James Graham as trustees for the time being of the EJM Family Trust. Leave was reserved to apply for further directions if necessary.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.