Rea v Lining Services Limited HC Auckland CIV 2008-404-2842
[2008] NZHC 2373
•17 June 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV 2008-404-2842
UNDER The Companies Act 1993
IN THE MATTER OF Asten Building Limited (in Liquidation) BETWEEN GERALD STANLEY REA AND PAUL
GRAHAM SARGISON Liquidators
ANDLINING SERVICES LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS AUCKLAND LINING SERVICES (2007) LIMITED AND AUCKLAND SERVICES LIMITED)
Other Party
Hearing: 11 June 2008
Appearances: R B Hucker for liquidators
Judgment: 17 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF ALLAN J
Solicitors:
Hucker & Associates, Auckland [email protected]
GS REA AND ANOR V LINING SERVICES LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS AUCKLAND LINING SERVICES (2007) LIMITED AND AUCKLAND SERVICES LIMITED) HC AK CIV 2008-404-2842 17 June
2008
[1] This is an application by the liquidators for orders pursuant to ss 292-296 of the Companies Act 1993 in respect of certain allegedly voidable transactions.
[2] Asten Building Ltd was placed in liquidation by special resolution of the shareholders of the company on 22 January 2007. The liquidators were appointed to be liquidators of the company. They subsequently served upon the Other Party a notice to set aside voidable transactions. The sum claimed in that notice was
$90,000. At a later date the liquidators satisfied themselves that the payments made by Asten Building Ltd to the Other Party, relevant to the notice to set aside, amounted to $45,000 only and not the sum of $90,000 as claimed in the notice.
[3] The Other Party filed a notice of objection within the time prescribed by s 294(3) of the Act; thereafter the liquidators commenced this proceeding, which was set down for first mention on Wednesday 11 June 2008 at 10 am.
[4] There was no appearance on behalf of the Other Party at the hearing. Mr Hucker for the liquidators, produced an affidavit of service which he noted contained an error, in that it specified that the hearing time stipulated in the papers served on the Other Party was 11 am on 11 June 2008, rather than 10 am.
[5] The Other Party having filed no notice of opposition, it was called at 10 am on 11 June but there was no appearance. I then released Mr Hucker, who had another commitment, and had the proceeding called outside the Courtroom again at
11 am. There was no appearance on that occasion either.
[6] In all the circumstances it is safe to conclude that the application is unopposed. I have considered Mr Rea’s affidavit, and am satisfied that the liquidators have established their entitlement to the orders sought.
[7] Accordingly, I make the following orders:
a) There will be an order setting aside, pursuant to s 294 of the
Companies Act 1993, payments of $5000 each, made by Auckland
Lining Services Ltd to Asten Building Ltd (in liquidation) on 12 July
2006, 19 July 2006. 26 July 2006, 2 August 2006, 9 August 2006,
16 August 2006, 23 August 2006, 20 September 2006 and 4 October
2006, making in all a total of $45,000.
b) The Other Party is directed to repay to the liquidators the sum of
$45,000, being the value of those transactions calculated pursuant to s 295 of the Companies Act, and directing that judgment be entered for such sum, together with interest and costs to be fixed by the Registrar.
c) The judgment is to carry interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of liquidation up to and including 30 June 2008, and at 8.4% per annum from and after 1 July 2008.
d)The Other Party is to pay the liquidators’ costs of and incidental to this application in accordance with category 2B.
C J Allan J
0
0
0