Re Beaton
[2015] NZHC 1304
•10 June 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2015-404-1067 [2015] NZHC 1304
UNDER Section 119(2) of the Insolvency Act 2006 IN THE MATTER
of ANDREW ROBERT BEATON
IN THE MATTER
of an application by Andrew Robert BEATON for a vesting order following a Disclaimer of Property by the Official Assignee dated 19 April 2011
BETWEEN
ANDREW ROBERT BEATON Plaintiff
Hearing: On the Papers Appearances:
P Cogswell for Applicant
Judgment:
10 June 2015
JUDGMENT OF WHATA J
This judgment was delivered by Justice Whata on
10 June 2015 at 10.00 a.m., pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:
Solicitors:
Cogswell Law, Auckland
BEATON [2015] NZHC 1304 [10 June 2015]
[1] This is an application for a vesting order following a disclaimer of property by the Official Assignee.
[2] All relevant parties that were required to be served in accordance with a direction of this Court consent or otherwise do not oppose the application.
[3] The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by Andrew Robert Beaton. He confirms the following matters:
(a) He was adjudicated bankrupt on 16 April 2009 and discharged from bankruptcy on 16 April 2012.
(b)Together with his wife he was a joint tenant in a property at 7 Edward Street, Riverhead, Auckland (Identifier NA11D/909, North Auckland Registry, as being Lot 11, Deposited Plan 56486) (“the land”).
(c) Mr Beaton owns the land in equal shares with his wife.
(d) The land was subject to a mortgage in favour of ANZ National Bank
Ltd and a charging order in favour of Metind Ltd.
(e) The ANZ mortgage was not in default and the Official Assignee
disclaimed its interest in Mr Beaton’s share of land on 19 April 2011.
[4] An affidavit is also filed by Ms Pamela Jane Beaton, who confirms the matters raised by Mr Beaton in his affidavit.
[5] I also have the affidavit of Paul Reid Cogswell confirming: (a) Consent by the ANZ National Bank Ltd.
(b) Consent by Metind Ltd.
(c) Acknowledgement of service by the Official Assignee together with confirmation that the Official Assignee does not wish to be heard on the application.
(d)An e-mail from Treasury, acknowledging receipt of service by Treasury and also recording that it is the Treasury that deals with the disclaimed property not the Attorney-General.
(e) A copy of a Treasury letter of 22 December in relation to the related caveat proceeding indicating that it does not consent, nor oppose the orders sought.
[6] At my request, Treasury have also confirmed that it neither consents to, nor opposes the application.
[7] Given that the parties affected by the application consent or do not oppose the vesting, I am satisfied that the orders sought by Mr Beaton should be made in the interests of justice.
[8] Accordingly, there shall be the following orders:
(a) That the interest of Andrew Robert Beaton in the property at 7
Edward Street, Riverhead, Auckland, more particularly described in Identifier NA11D/909, North Auckland Registry, as being Lot 11, Deposited Plan 56386, currently vested in the Crown bona vacantia, be vested in Andrew Robert Beaton.
(b) There is no order regarding costs.
4
0
0