Rafiq v Attorney-General

Case

[2018] NZSC 45

14 May 2018


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI MANA NUI

 SC 122/2017
 [2018] NZSC 45
BETWEEN

RAZDAN RAFIQ
Applicant

AND

ATTORNEY-GENERAL
First Respondent

SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Second Respondent
INDEPENDENT POLICE CONDUCT AUTHORITY
Third Respondent
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Fourth Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Fifth Respondent
AUCKLAND COUNCIL
Sixth Respondent

Court:

William Young, Glazebrook and O’Regan JJ

Counsel:

Applicant in person

Judgment:

14 May 2018

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for recall of this Court’s judgment
(Rafiq v Attorney‑General [2017] NZSC 182) is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

  1. On 4 December 2017, this Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal made by the applicant for want of jurisdiction.[1]

    [1]Rafiq v Attorney‑General [2017] NZSC 182.

  2. The applicant applies for a recall of the judgment.  Nothing in his application provides any proper basis for recall.  In particular, the applicant incorrectly asserts this Court has jurisdiction to deal with his application for leave to appeal.  For the reasons given in the judgment to which the present application relates, that is incorrect.

  3. There are no grounds to recall the judgment and the application is therefore dismissed.


Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0

Rafiq v Attorney-General [2017] NZSC 182