R v Wichman
Case
•
[2016] NZHC 1663
•21 July 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Wichman [2016] NZHC 1663
[2016] NZHC 1663
21 July 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of The Queen v Tawera Wesley Wichman, the defendant was sentenced for causing the death of his daughter, Teegan, who died from a brain injury inflicted by the defendant. The case was heard by the High Court of New Zealand, Wellington Registry. The central legal issue was the appropriate sentence for manslaughter, considering the circumstances of the case and the defendant's acknowledgment of responsibility.
The court had to balance the need to denounce the harm caused to a young child with the unique circumstances surrounding the incident. The defendant, who was 17 at the time of the incident, had pleaded guilty after a lengthy period of denial. The court acknowledged the challenging situation faced by the young parents, including the premature birth of twins and the difficulties associated with caring for them. The court also considered the significant personal and familial consequences of the defendant's actions, including the loss of custody of his children and the impact on his business and relationships.
After weighing these factors, the court determined that while imprisonment was necessary to hold the defendant accountable, the sentence should reflect the mitigating circumstances. The court imposed a sentence of three years and 10 months, which represented a starting point of five and a half to six years, reduced due to the unique aspects of the case. The final order was that the defendant was to serve this term of imprisonment for manslaughter.
The court had to balance the need to denounce the harm caused to a young child with the unique circumstances surrounding the incident. The defendant, who was 17 at the time of the incident, had pleaded guilty after a lengthy period of denial. The court acknowledged the challenging situation faced by the young parents, including the premature birth of twins and the difficulties associated with caring for them. The court also considered the significant personal and familial consequences of the defendant's actions, including the loss of custody of his children and the impact on his business and relationships.
After weighing these factors, the court determined that while imprisonment was necessary to hold the defendant accountable, the sentence should reflect the mitigating circumstances. The court imposed a sentence of three years and 10 months, which represented a starting point of five and a half to six years, reduced due to the unique aspects of the case. The final order was that the defendant was to serve this term of imprisonment for manslaughter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Causation
-
Negligence
-
Vicarious Liability
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Wichman [2016] NZHC 1663
Most Recent Citation
Mulford v The King [2025] NZCA 444
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Mulford v The King
[2025] NZCA 444
R v Wallis
[2023] NZHC 2029
R v Wakefield
[2019] NZHC 1629
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0