R v Taulapapa

Case

[2018] NZHC 2770

25 October 2018

No judgment structure available for this case.

ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF WITNESS/VICTIM/CONNECTED PERSON(S) PURSUANT TO S 202

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. SEE

THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHEO

CRI-2017-004-012360 [2018] NZHC 2770

BETWEEN THE QUEEN

AND

SYDNEE SHAUNNA TAULAPAPA Defendant

On the papers

Appearances:

B Dickey for Crown
A Creswell for Defendant

Judgment:

25 October 2018

JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD J

This judgment was delivered by me on 25 October 2018 at 2.30 pm

Pursuant to Rule 11.5 High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

R v TAULAPAPA [2018] NZHC 2770 [25 October 2018]

[1]      On 27 April 2018, Woodhouse J sentenced Sydnee Shaunna Taulapapa on charges of kidnapping and burglary, by discharging her without conviction.1  The order was made upon the conditions that Ms Taulapapa should pay reparation of $2,000 to the parents of the baby who was kidnapped, if they wished to accept it, or pay that sum to a suitable charity. A further condition was that Ms Taulapapa was to undertake 400 hours of voluntary community work.

[2]      The  parents  of  the  baby  chose  not  to  accept  the  reparation  sum,  which

Ms Taulapapa then paid directly to an agreed charity.

[3]      Because  the  reparations  payment  was  not  made  into  Court,  however,

Ms Taulapapa remains liable to enforcement action.

[4]      Woodhouse J has since retired, so the matter has been brought to me for consideration.   To avoid enforcement in circumstances where Ms Taulapapa has complied with the intent of the Judge's order, I recall the sentence condition imposed at [71] (a) of the sentencing notes and replace it, retrospectively, with an order that

Ms Taulapapa shall pay reparation of $2,000 directly to a charity concerned with the interests of new-born children or young people.  I record that she has complied with that order.

[5]      In doing so, it is my intention that steps will be taken to ensure that the reparations collections procedure, based on Woodhouse J's order, is discontinued.

...............................................

Toogood J

1 R v TAULAPAPA [2018] NZHC 834 [27 April 2018].

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

R v Taulapapa [2018] NZHC 834