R v Savage

Case [2001] NZCA 434

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND  CA408/00

THE QUEEN

V

BARRY CAINE SAVAGE

Coram:  Blanchard J Tipping J McGrath J

Judgment:

(On the papers)  1 February 2001

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

[1]      The appellant applied for legal aid to prosecute this appeal.  That application was declined.  The appellant was given the opportunity to make written submissions but has not done so.   The Court has decided the appeal on the papers.   We have considered the grounds of appeal advanced by the appellant and found them to be without merit.

[2]      The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Details
AGLC
R v Savage [2001] NZCA 434
Case
[2001] NZCA 434
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Savage, the respondent, Barry Caine Savage, was appealing against his conviction and sentence. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. Savage was convicted of charges related to the supply of dangerous drugs and was sentenced to imprisonment. The appeal was dismissed on the basis of the grounds being without merit.

The legal issues presented to the Court of Appeal were the validity of the conviction and the appropriateness of the sentence imposed on the respondent. The Court was required to consider whether the evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to support the conviction and whether the sentence was appropriate in the circumstances.

The Court of Appeal found that the evidence presented at the trial was sufficient to support the conviction and that the sentence imposed was appropriate. The Court held that the grounds of appeal advanced by the respondent were without merit and dismissed the appeal. The Court found that the trial judge had correctly applied the law and that there was no error in the proceedings that would warrant a new trial or a reduced sentence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.