R v Sanders
Case
•
[2019] NZHC 164
•15 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Sanders [2019] NZHC 164
[2019] NZHC 164
15 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Bailey Desmond Sanders was sentenced in the High Court of New Zealand for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and assault with intent to injure. The defendant had pleaded guilty to both charges. The court was required to decide whether the maximum sentence for the wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm charge should be imposed without the possibility of parole. The court considered the defendant's personal circumstances, including his history of violence and lack of remorse, as well as the impact of his offending on the victim. The court also considered the purposes of sentencing, including accountability, deterrence, and protection of the community. The court determined that the maximum sentence without parole would not be manifestly unjust and imposed a 14-year sentence for the wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm charge, with a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years. The court also imposed a 12-month sentence for the assault with intent to injure charge, to be served concurrently with the other sentences. The sentences were to be served concurrently with the defendant's existing sentence.
In conclusion, the court imposed a 14-year sentence for the wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm charge, with a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years, and a 12-month sentence for the assault with intent to injure charge, to be served concurrently with the defendant's existing sentence. The court found that the maximum sentence without parole was not manifestly unjust and that the defendant's personal circumstances and history of violence warranted a harsh sentence. The court also emphasized the importance of holding the defendant accountable and protecting the community from further offending.
In conclusion, the court imposed a 14-year sentence for the wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm charge, with a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years, and a 12-month sentence for the assault with intent to injure charge, to be served concurrently with the defendant's existing sentence. The court found that the maximum sentence without parole was not manifestly unjust and that the defendant's personal circumstances and history of violence warranted a harsh sentence. The court also emphasized the importance of holding the defendant accountable and protecting the community from further offending.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Criminal Liability
-
Repeat Offender
-
Manifestly Unjust
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Sanders [2019] NZHC 164
Most Recent Citation
R v Nepia [2022] NZHC 198
Cases Citing This Decision
12
R v Nepia
[2022] NZHC 198
Benson v Police
[2020] NZHC 1946
R v Allen
[2020] NZHC 1796
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0
R v Harrison
[2016] NZCA 381
R v Nuku
[2018] NZHC 2510
R v Pomee
[2018] NZHC 2891