R v Police HC Tauranga CRI 2008-470-23
[2008] NZHC 1382
•4 September 2008
This case has been anonymized
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY
CRI 2008-470-23
BETWEEN R
Appellant
ANDNEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
Hearing: 4 September 2008
Counsel: P G Mabey QC for Appellant
R G Ronayne for Respondent
Judgment: 4 September 2008
(ORAL) JUDGMENT OF HEATH J
Solicitor:
Crown Solicitor, Tauranga
Counsel:P G Mabey QC, Tauranga
R V NEW ZEALAND POLICE HC TAU CRI 2008-470-23 4 September 2008
[1] Mr R appeals against a decision of the District Court at Tauranga given on
25 July 2008, in which the Court declined his application for a discharge without conviction on nine charges of forgery.
[2] I have heard argument this morning on the appeal. I have reached the conclusion that the appeal should be allowed.
[3] The appeal is allowed. The conviction and fines entered in the District Court are set aside. In lieu thereof, I make the following orders:
a) Mr R is discharged without conviction on each of the nine charges of forgery brought against him.
b)Under s 106(3)(a) of the Sentencing Act 2002, Mr R shall pay to the Crown the sum of $7500, as a contribution towards the costs of the investigation and Police prosecution.
c) Under s 106(3)(b), Mr R shall pay the sum of $7500 to Rowing New Zealand as compensation for moneys out-laid by that organisation in investigating the irregularities in issue.
That makes a total payment of $15,000 under those two provisions. The orders for costs and compensation shall be recorded against CRN 536. On the remaining charges discharges will be entered.
[4] Reasons for this decision will be given in writing as soon as practicable.
P R Heath J
0
0
0