IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
CRI-2019-85-1983
[2020] NZHC 1887
THE QUEEN v
BRIAN DAVID MCCONACHIE
Hearing: 31 July 2020 Counsel:
G J Burston and A F Oliver for Crown
V C Nisbet and N Bond for Mr McConachie
Sentencing:
31 July 2020
SENTENCING REMARKS OF SIMON FRANCE J
[1] Mr McConachie pleaded guilty to the murder of Ms Irina Scantee in the early evening of Saturday, 17 August 2019. It is submitted on his behalf that a sentence of imprisonment less than life imprisonment is appropriate in the circumstances.1
Facts
[2] Mr McConachie and the victim had been in a relationship which had ended. Mr McConachie was struggling to cope with the end of the relationship. He was at times suicidal over it, and at other times angry about it.
[3] On 9 August 2019 Mr McConachie presented to mental health services with what was assessed as acute distress secondary to a relationship breakdown. He was
1 Sentencing Act 2002, s 102.
R v MCCONACHIE [2020] NZHC 1887 [31 July 2020]
diagnosed with acute adjustment disorder with suicidal ideations. Mr McConachie was upset and talked of not being able to live without the victim. He expressed thoughts of suicide and was said to present as morose, tearful and slow to talk. He was, however, able to give a clear, simple account of his thinking.
[4] Mr McConachie remained in care within a hospital facility until his release on 12 August. At that stage, nursing staff described him as stable in mood, with an occasional low mood. He was assessed by a psychiatrist on the day of discharge. He reported himself as feeling better, and having no further thoughts of self-harm. He made arrangements to move to a boarding house on the Kāpiti Coast. He was not on any medication at the time of discharge. He was contacted by a psychiatric nurse on 13 August by phone. At that time he said he was safe, and he was referred to mental health services in the area for follow-up. That was his last contact with mental health services prior to the offending.
[5] On the day of the killing, at about 8 pm, Mr McConachie drove to a boarding house in Paraparaumu Beach where the victim was residing. He arranged to speak with the victim in his car, and she was seen leaving the boarding house dressed in her bedtime attire. The victim commented to a witness that she was going to speak to the defendant briefly. Her clothing, and the fact that she had left her personal belongings including her wallet and cell phone in the bedroom, indicated that she did not intend to go anywhere.
[6] As it happens, she got into Mr McConachie’s car and he drove them a distance down the main street, before parking. Either during the journey or at that time, he began to strangle the victim. She was able to get out…
Continue reading R v McConachie
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v McConachie [2020] NZHC 1887
- Case
- [2020] NZHC 1887
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the brutal nature of the murder, which was premeditated and carried out in public, driven by anger and jealousy following the end of a relationship. Despite McConachie's history of mood disorders and adjustment difficulties, the court found that his culpability was not significantly diminished by his mental health issues. The court noted that while McConachie's intellectual capabilities were limited, and he had a history of struggling to cope with life stresses, these factors did not meet the stringent test of "manifest injustice" required to depart from the statutory presumption of life imprisonment for murder. The court also considered the potential impact of imprisonment on McConachie, acknowledging his difficulties but finding that these did not preclude a life sentence.
In conclusion, the court sentenced McConachie to life imprisonment for murder, with a minimum period of imprisonment set at 10 years. This sentence balanced the need for accountability and deterrence with the recognition of McConachie's personal circumstances and the severity of the offence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.