R v Hepana

Case

[2014] NZHC 504

18 March 2014


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Hepana [2014] NZHC 504 [2014] NZHC 504 18 March 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the High Court of New Zealand, Auckland Registry, the case of The Queen v Gene Hepana was heard and determined on 18 March 2014. Mr Hepana had pleaded guilty to the murder of Jasmine Cooper. The court was tasked with determining the minimum term of imprisonment that should be imposed on Mr Hepana before he becomes eligible for parole. The court also needed to consider various aggravating and mitigating factors in determining the appropriate sentence.

The court began by outlining the facts of the case. Mr Hepana and Ms Cooper had been in a relationship and living together until an argument in November 2013 led to its end. Despite this, Mr Hepana continued to contact Ms Cooper, leading her to serve a trespass notice on him. On 22 December 2013, Mr Hepana went to Ms Cooper's property despite her requests for him to leave. He argued with her on her porch, strangled her to the point of unconsciousness, and then struck her with a rock, causing her death. Mr Hepana pleaded guilty to the charge of murder before a full pathological report was prepared.

In determining the minimum term of imprisonment, the court considered several aggravating factors. The attack occurred in the middle of the night on a vulnerable woman living alone, and Mr Hepana had no legal right to be on the property. Additionally, he had a history of violent offending, particularly against women, and had previously been sentenced to ten years imprisonment for serious violent crimes. The court also considered mitigating factors, such as Mr Hepana's early guilty plea, although it noted his lack of remorse and the overwhelming nature of the evidence against him. The court ultimately decided to reduce the minimum term by one year to reflect the early guilty plea.

The court sentenced Mr Hepana to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 17 years before he becomes eligible for parole. The court's decision was based on the gravity of the offence, Mr Hepana's history of violent offending, and the need to deter future similar conduct. The court emphasised that the actual sentence of life imprisonment would be determined by the parole authorities, who would consider the risk Mr Hepana posed to the community upon potential release.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

  • Brutality

  • Aggravating Factors

  • Mitigating Factors

  • Guilty Plea

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Davis v R [2019] NZCA 40

Cases Citing This Decision

6

Davis v R [2019] NZCA 40
R v Marong [2018] NZHC 748
R v Schofield [2015] NZHC 2109
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0

Pahau v R [2011] NZCA 147
Pahau v R [2011] NZCA 147