ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF VICTIMS PURSUANT TO S 202 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. SEE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CRI-2021-404-340
[2021] NZHC 3286
THE QUEEN v
ROSS DOUGLAS BROWNE
Hearing: 2 December 2021 Counsel:
J V Barry for Crown
K L Hamblin for defendant
Sentence:
2 December 2021
SENTENCING NOTES OF TOOGOOD J
Solicitors:
Crown Solicitor, Auckland Katrina Hamblin, Auckland
R v BROWNE [2021] NZHC 3286 [2 December 2021]
[1] Ross Douglas Browne, you appear for sentence having pleaded guilty to 15 charges of alleged historic sexual offending while you were employed as chaplain and a teacher at Dilworth School between 1987 and 2002.1 Your pleas on 6 October 2021 were entered following your acceptance of a sentence indication I gave on 3 September 2021, based on the agreed Crown charge notice and summary of facts.2
[2] In the sentence indication, I said that, if you pleaded guilty, I would take a total end sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment as a starting point, and then allow a 25 per cent discount for pleading guilty. I said I would then consider such other mitigating factors as may appropriately be taken into account, once I had received a pre-sentence report and heard further submissions from counsel. I will explain that more fully as I go through my reasons for the sentences I impose.
He mihi/Acknowledgements
[3] I acknowledge the presence in Court of eight of the complainants who are victims of your offending, Mr Browne. I acknowledge also the other complainants who are viewing the hearing remotely. As well, the mothers of two of the victims are here in court or relations of them, and two others have also joined remotely. They and other family members are, of course, equally victims in this case. It is right, and important, that the victims have played a significant role in this hearing, not only through their presence but through the victim impact statements they have read, or which others have read for them:
Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou.
1 Ten charges of indecency with boy between 12 and 16, Crimes Act 1961, s 140A(1)(a), maximum period of imprisonment: seven years; three charges of indecency with boy under 12, Crimes Act 1961, s 140(1)(a) and (c), maximum period of imprisonment: 10 years; one charge of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, Crimes Act 1961, ss 128(3) and 128B, maximum period of imprisonment: 14 years; one charge of indecent assault on man or boy, Crimes Act 1961, s 141(a), maximum period of imprisonment: seven years; one charge of possession of objectionable publications, Films, Videos & Publications Classification Act 1993, s 131A(1), maximum period of imprisonment: 10 years.
2 Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 61.
Background
[4] The charges you have admitted arise out of a Police investigation into allegations of historic sexual abuse committed by staff and other individuals associated with Dilworth School in Auckland.…
Continue reading R v Browne
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Browne [2021] NZHC 3286
- Case
- [2021] NZHC 3286
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court emphasised the devastating impact of Browne's offending on the victims and their families, and acknowledged the courage of the victims in coming forward. The court hoped that the hearing would enable the victims to begin a process of healing. The victims' accounts highlighted the profound and lasting effects of the abuse, including substance abuse, criminal behaviour, emotional deprivation, sexual confusion, and withdrawal from physical contact with others. Some victims spoke optimistically of their futures, having overcome the pain and distress sufficiently to focus on being good human beings and enjoying loving and caring relationships.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.