IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE
CRI-2017-091-000902
[2018] NZHC 1520
THE QUEEN v
WILLIAM ALLAN BERKLAND
Counsel; E M Light for Crown
C W J Stevenson for Defendant
Sentence:
22 June 2018
NOTES ON SENTENCE OF COLLINS J
Introduction
[1]Mr Berkland, you appear for sentence in relation to 14 charges:
(1)one representative charge of supplying methamphetamine;1
(2)one representative charge of possession of methamphetamine for supply;2
(3)two charges of possession of methamphetamine for supply;3
1 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(c) and (2)(a); and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty life imprisonment.
2 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(f) and (2)(a); and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty life imprisonment.
3 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(f) and (2)(a); and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty life imprisonment.
R v BERKLAND [2018] NZHC 1520 [22 June 2018]
(4)two representative charges of offering to supply methamphetamine;4
(5)one charge of conspiracy to supply methamphetamine;5
(6)one representative charge of supplying NBOMe (a Class B controlled drug – sometimes described as a “psychedelic” drug);6
(7)one representative charge of offering to supply NBOMe;7
(8)one representative charge of possession of NBOMe for supply;8
(9)one charge of possession of cannabis for supply;9
(10)one charge relating to the possession of Diazepam for supply;10
(11)one charge of cultivating cannabis;11
(12)one representative charge of unlawfully possessing a firearm;12
(13)one representative charge of unlawfully possessing ammunition;13 and
(14)one representative charge of unlawfully possessing a taser.14
[2] You pleaded guilty to these charges following a sentence indication on 20 April 2018.15
4 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(c) and (2)(a); maximum penalty life imprisonment.
5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(2A)(a); maximum penalty 14 years’ imprisonment.
6 Sections 6(1)(c) and (2)(b); maximum penalty 14 years’ imprisonment.
7 Sections 6(1)(c) and (2)(b); maximum penalty 14 years’ imprisonment.
8 Sections 6(1)(f) and (2)(b); maximum penalty 14 years’ imprisonment.
9 Sections 6(1)(f) and (2)(c); maximum penalty eight years’ imprisonment.
10 Sections 6(1)(f) and (2)(c); maximum penalty eight years’ imprisonment.
11 Sections 9(1) and (2); maximum penalty seven years’ imprisonment.
12 Arms Act 1983, s 45; and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty four years’ imprisonment.
13 Arms Act 1983, s 45; and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty three years’ imprisonment.
14 Arms Act 1983, s 50; and Crimes Act 1961, s 66(2); maximum penalty four years’ imprisonment.
[3]This afternoon I shall:
(1)set out your offending;
(2)outline the appropriate starting point for that offending;
(3)explain the adjustments that may be made to the starting point; and
(4)provide you with your final sentence.
Offending
[4] The charges result from a police operation code-named “Operation Walnut” which commenced in November 2016. That investigation targeted the commercial supply of methamphetamine in the Wellington region.
[5] A surveillance device warrant allowed police to intercept private communications and carry out visual surveillance of two principal targets, yourself and Mr Blance. You…
Continue reading R v Berkland
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Berkland [2018] NZHC 1520
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 1520
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.