IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND PALMERSTON NORTH REGISTRY
CRI 2012-054-3190 [2013] NZHC 1377
NEW ZEALAND POLICE
v
JIREN LI
Hearing: 11 June 2013
Counsel: Mr P Murray for Crown
Mr S Winter for Li
Sentence: 11 June 2013
SENTENCING REMARKS OF MALLON J
Introduction
[1] Mr Li you appear for sentencing today having pleaded guilty to the following charges:
(a) three charges of sale of a temporary Class C controlled drug, namely
JWH-018 (commonly known as “Kronic”);1
(b)one charge of possession of JWH-018 or Kronic for the purpose of sale;2 and
(c) one charge of unlawful possession of a pistol.3
1 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(e).
2 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 6(1)(f), with a maximum penalty of eight years’ imprisonment.
3 Arms Act 1983, s 50(1)(a), with a maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment and/or a fine
not exceeding $4,000.
NEW ZEALAND POLICE v LI [2013] NZHC 1377 [11 June 2013]
[2] There was an error in the informations in relation to the charges of sale in that the wrong section was referred to and I note that, by consent, this is corrected by me.4 The Crown is not proceeding with a further charge in relation to the sale of AKB-48 (also known as K2) because it has not been able to be confirmed that the product contained AKB-48. You are therefore discharged on that count.
[3] You appear for sentencing in this Court because the District Court declined jurisdiction. That was on the basis of the summary of facts as it was then prepared. It has since been amended.
Circumstances of the offending
[4] Your offending relates to the sale of synthetic cannabis substances that you stocked at your store, Ace Discount Tobacconist. Kronic is a brand-name for a type of synthetic cannabis. It contains JWH-018. From 16 August 2011 it has been a Class C controlled drug under the Temporary Class Drug Notices.5 The Palmerston North police were alerted to your activities by concerned members of the public.
[5] Between June and October 2012, police carried out an investigation into your store. This involved three occasions in that period that a special duties police officer asked you for Kronic. On each occasion you reached under the counter for a small clear plastic bag which contained between 2.5 and 2.8 grams of dried plant material for $40. These sales took place on 21 June 2012, 24 July 2012 and 7 September
2012. Subsequent ESR testing of the material that was sold to the special duties officers found that it contained JWH-018.
[6] The police subsequently executed search warrants at your store and home on
18 October 2012. At your store, the police discovered 4,861 packets of synthetic cannabis, including 491 packets of Kronic. The packets of Kronic have a total retail value of $19,640. However the packets of Kronic were not tested by the ESR and it
is therefore not known whether they contained JWH-018.
4 The informations refer to s 6(1)(f) of…
Continue reading Police v Li
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Police v Li [2013] NZHC 1377
- Case
- [2013] NZHC 1377
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court first corrected an error in the informations concerning the charges of sale. It then noted the circumstances of the offending, which involved Mr Li selling synthetic cannabis substances from his store, Ace Discount Tobacconist. Police investigation revealed that Mr Li had sold JWH-018 on three occasions between June and October 2012. A search of Mr Li's store and home uncovered a large quantity of synthetic cannabis packets, many of which were not tested for the presence of JWH-018. The police also found an illegally modified .22 firearm at Mr Li's store. Mr Li accepted responsibility for his offending and had no previous convictions.
Considering all factors, the court decided on a starting point of around two years and six months' imprisonment, uplifted for the unlawful possession of the firearm. However, taking into account mitigating factors such as Mr Li's early guilty plea and low risk of reoffending, the court deemed a sentence of home detention appropriate. The court imposed a ten-month sentence of home detention, concurrent sentences of ten months for the three sale charges, and a concurrent two-month sentence for the firearms charge. The court also ordered the forfeiture and destruction of all seized exhibits and products.
In conclusion, Mr Li was sentenced to a total of ten months' home detention for his offending, with concurrent sentences for the individual charges. The court ordered the forfeiture and destruction of all seized products and the illegally modified firearm.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.