Pierce v Spargo
[2013] NZHC 3124
•26 November 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2012-485-001021 [2013] NZHC 3124
UNDER the Property Law Act 2007
IN THE MATTER of an Application for Order of Division of Property pursuant to s 339 of the Property Law Act 2007
BETWEEN STEVEN EVAN PIERCE Plaintiff
ANDJENNIFER ANN SPARGO First Defendant
IAN JAMES EDWARD SPARGO and
HELEN MELVA SPARGO Second Defendants
Judgment: 26 November 2013
JUDGMENT AS TO COSTS OF COLLINS J
Introduction
[1] In my judgment of 14 August 2013 I awarded costs to the defendants on a scale 2B basis.
[2] Since issuing my judgment:
(1)Counsel for the first defendant has advised that she acted on a pro bono basis and does not seek costs other than an order that the plaintiff pay her disbursements in the sum of $454.80.
(2) Counsel for the second defendants has asked that the second
defendants’ costs be fixed in the sum of $12,079.60 plus
disbursements of $336.32. Counsel for the second defendants
PIERCE v SPARGO [2013] NZHC 3124 [26 November 2013]
explains in his memorandum that this sum is less than the sum that would be payable on a scale 2B basis because of the concessional rate which he charged the second defendants.
[3] The plaintiff has not responded to the memoranda filed by counsel for the first and second defendants.
First defendant’s disbursements
[4] The disbursements sought by the first defendant appear to be reasonable for litigation of this kind. I accordingly order the plaintiff pay the first defendant’s disbursements in the sum of $454.80. No other orders need be made in favour of the first defendant.
Second defendants’ costs and disbursements
[5] The memorandum from counsel for the second defendants demonstrates that the costs sought are very reasonable as is the claim for disbursements. In these circumstances I have no hesitation in ordering the plaintiff pay the second
defendants’ costs in the sum of $12,079.60 plus disbursements of $336.32.
D B Collins J
Solicitors:
Ord Legal, Wellington for Plaintiff
Helen Croft, Wellington for First DefendantLance Pratley Law, Wellington for Second Defendants
0
0