IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2012-485-001021 [2013] NZHC 3124
UNDER the Property Law Act 2007
IN THE MATTER of an Application for Order of Division of Property pursuant to s 339 of the Property Law Act 2007
BETWEEN STEVEN EVAN PIERCE Plaintiff
ANDJENNIFER ANN SPARGO First Defendant
IAN JAMES EDWARD SPARGO and
HELEN MELVA SPARGO Second Defendants
Judgment: 26 November 2013
JUDGMENT AS TO COSTS OF COLLINS J
Introduction
[1] In my judgment of 14 August 2013 I awarded costs to the defendants on a scale 2B basis.
[2] Since issuing my judgment:
(1)Counsel for the first defendant has advised that she acted on a pro bono basis and does not seek costs other than an order that the plaintiff pay her disbursements in the sum of $454.80.
(2) Counsel for the second defendants has asked that the second
defendants’ costs be fixed in the sum of $12,079.60 plus
disbursements of $336.32. Counsel for the second defendants
PIERCE v SPARGO [2013] NZHC 3124 [26 November 2013]
explains in his memorandum that this sum is less than the sum that would be payable on a scale 2B basis because of the concessional rate which he charged the second defendants.
[3] The plaintiff has not responded to the memoranda filed by counsel for the first and second defendants.
First defendant’s disbursements
[4] The disbursements sought by the first defendant appear to be reasonable for litigation of this kind. I accordingly order the plaintiff pay the first defendant’s disbursements in the sum of $454.80. No other orders need be made in favour of the first defendant.
Second defendants’ costs and disbursements
[5] The memorandum from counsel for the second defendants demonstrates that the costs sought are very reasonable as is the claim for disbursements. In these circumstances I have no hesitation in ordering the plaintiff pay the second
defendants’ costs in the sum of $12,079.60 plus disbursements of $336.32.
D B Collins J
Solicitors:
Ord Legal, Wellington for Plaintiff
Helen Croft, Wellington for First DefendantLance Pratley Law, Wellington for Second Defendants
- AGLC
- Pierce v Spargo [2013] NZHC 3124
- Case
- [2013] NZHC 3124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the submissions from the defendants' legal counsel. The first defendant, Jennifer Ann Spargo, represented by Helen Croft, had acted on a pro bono basis and only sought reimbursement of her disbursements amounting to $454.80. The second defendants, Ian James Edward Spargo and Helen Melva Spargo, represented by Lance Pratley Law, requested costs totalling $12,079.60 plus disbursements of $336.32, which was less than the scale 2B basis due to a concessional rate charged. The plaintiff, Steven Evan Pierce, did not respond to these submissions.
The court found the disbursements claimed by the first defendant to be reasonable and ordered the plaintiff to pay them. Regarding the second defendants' costs and disbursements, the court noted that the requested amount was very reasonable, considering the concessional rate. Therefore, the court ordered the plaintiff to pay the second defendants' costs of $12,079.60 plus disbursements of $336.32. The plaintiff's silence on the matter was noted, but the court proceeded with the orders as the amounts claimed were deemed reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.