Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Smith

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2014-404-1228 [2014] NZHC 1305

UNDER the Insolvency (Cross-border) Act 2006 and the High Court Rules

IN THE MATTER OF

an application pursuant to sch 1, Chapter III, art 15 of the Act, and rr 24.26, 24.57 and 18.7 of the Rules

BETWEEN

THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY

Applicant

AND

DAVID JOHN SMITH
of Bunbury, Western Australia, bankrupt
Respondent

Hearing: On the papers

Appearances:

Phillip Cornegé for Applicant

Judgment:

11 June 2014

JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE BELL

This judgment was delivered by me on   11 June 2014 at 11:00am

pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.

...................................

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

Solicitors:

Nielsen Law (David Nielsen), Hamilton, for Applicant

Counsel:

Phillip Cornegé, Barrister, Hamilton, for Applicant

THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY v SMITH [2014] NZHC 1305 [11 June 2014]

[1] This is an originating application for recognition of a foreign main proceeding under the Insolvency (Cross-border) Act 2006, sch 1, Chapter III, art 15. The Official Trustee applies for these orders:

(a)       dispensing with service on the respondent;

(b)for recognition under Chapter III of the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the Australian bankruptcy of David John Smith, arising out of a sequestration order made in the Federal Magistrates’ Court of Australia at Sydney on 19 September 2012; and

(c)       entrusting  the  administration  or  realisation  of  the  debtor’s  New

Zealand assets to the Official Assignee at Hamilton.

Facts

[2]      David  Smith,  the  respondent,  was  born  in  New  Zealand,  but  lives  in Australia, has an Australian domicile and is an Australian citizen.  In recent years he has lived in Western Australia. He presently lives in South Bunbury.

[3] On 19 September 2012, on the petition of Medfin Australia Pty Ltd a sequestration order was made under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) against Mr Smith in the Federal Magistrates’ Court of Australia at Sydney. The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy was appointed trustee of Mr Smith’s estate. Mr Smith has provided the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (was known as ITSA, now known as Australia Financial Security Authority) with a statement of affairs which discloses two New Zealand assets – an interest in the estate of his late father (the Public Trust in Nelson is administering the estate) and an account with the ANZ Bank in Nelson. The case manager in Australia asked Mr Smith to transfer the funds in the bank account to the Official Trustee, but Mr Smith refused to do so. Following contact by the case officer, the ANZ Bank has placed a block on the account pending this application. The ultimate purpose of this application is to have the funds in that bank account, which vested in the Official Trustee on Mr Smith’s adjudication in bankruptcy, transferred to the Official Trustee.

(a)       a certified copy of the sequestration order of 19 September 2012;1

(b)      a certificate of appointment of the Official Trustee;2

(c)      information identifying all foreign proceedings in respect of Mr Smith known to the Official Trustee(?);3 and

(d)that…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Smith and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] NZHC 1305
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Smith, the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy filed an originating application in the High Court of New Zealand seeking recognition of a foreign main proceeding under the Insolvency (Cross-border) Act 2006. The application was made against David John Smith, a bankrupt residing in Australia, who had assets in New Zealand. The primary legal issues the court had to decide were whether the Australian bankruptcy could be recognised as a foreign main proceeding and if service on the respondent could be dispensed with. The Official Trustee argued that due to the respondent's Australian domicile and residence, and the strong case for recognition, service could be dispensed with. However, the court found that it was necessary to serve the respondent in order to ensure natural justice, and that the application did not fall under any of the exceptions allowing for service to be dispensed with. Instead, the court found a middle path by making the recognition order and allowing the respondent to apply to set it aside within 30 working days.

The court held that it was necessary to serve the respondent to ensure natural justice, despite the strong case for recognition and the respondent's Australian domicile and residence. The court found that the application did not fall under any of the exceptions allowing for service to be dispensed with. However, the court also found that it was possible to make the recognition order while allowing the respondent to apply to set it aside within 30 working days. This approach was deemed appropriate given the close relations between Australia and New Zealand, and the confidence both countries have in each other's legal systems. The court granted leave to serve the order outside New Zealand and extended the time for the respondent to apply to review the order to 30 working days after service.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.