| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND |
| SC 36/2013 [2013] NZSC 53 |
| BETWEEN | THE NEW ZEALAND PORK INDUSTRY BOARD |
| AND | THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE MINISTRY OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES |
| AND | THE CHIEF TECHNICAL OFFICER AND BIOSECURITY NEW ZEALAND |
| Court: | Elias CJ, McGrath, William Young and Glazebrook JJ |
Counsel: | F M R Cooke QC and J B Kaye for Applicant |
Judgment: | 31 May 2013 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF
Pending the determination of the appeal or sooner order of the Court, nothing is to be done by the Director-General in reliance on the health standards in issue.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS
There is scope for argument as to the relevant status quo (given that the last interim order lapsed in early April). As well, the appeal rights of the appellant would not be rendered nugatory by a refusal of the order. Nonetheless, it can be said that the making of the order is necessary to preserve the position of the appellant (which is that pending further statutory processes, pork from countries affected by PRRS should not be imported). Given this, and allowing for the imminence of the fixture and the fact that pork products have not yet been imported into New Zealand pursuant to the disputed import health standards, we consider it appropriate to make the order sought.
Solicitors:
Jonathan Kaye Law, Wellington for Applicant
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondents
- AGLC
- NZ Pork Industry Board v Director General [2013] NZSC 53
- Case
- [2013] NZSC 53
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the New Zealand Pork Industry Board had sufficient legal standing to bring the action and whether there were any grounds for granting interim relief. The court noted that the applicants had a direct interest in the matter, as the importation of pork products from PRRS-affected countries could potentially harm the domestic pork industry. The court also highlighted that the appeal rights of the applicants would not be rendered nugatory by a refusal of the order. Furthermore, the court found that making the order was necessary to preserve the position of the applicants, which was that, pending further statutory processes, pork from countries affected by PRRS should not be imported. Given these factors, the court considered it appropriate to make the order sought by the applicants.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court granted the interim relief sought by the New Zealand Pork Industry Board, ordering that nothing be done by the Director-General in reliance on the health standards in issue until the determination of the appeal. This decision was based on the need to preserve the applicants' position and to prevent any potential harm to the domestic pork industry from the importation of pork products from PRRS-affected countries. The court's decision provides a temporary reprieve for the applicants, allowing them to continue their efforts to challenge the import health standards through the judicial review process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.