North Canterbury Clay Target Association Incorporated v Waimakariri District Council

Case

[2015] NZCA 225

10 June 2015 at 10:30 am


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND

CA21/2015
[2015] NZCA 225

BETWEEN

NORTH CANTERBURY CLAY TARGET ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
Applicant

AND

WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL
Respondent

Hearing:

8 June 2015

Court:

Randerson, French and Winkelmann JJ

Counsel:

P A Steven QC for Applicant
A J Prebble for Respondent

Judgment:

10 June 2015 at 10:30 am

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Leave to appeal is granted under s 308 of the Resource Management Act 1991 on the following questions:

  1. Does rule 31.11.1.2 of the Waimakariri District Plan require compliance with specified noise limits at the notional boundary of any dwellinghouse in the Rural zone in existence from time to time, notwithstanding that the dwellinghouse was not in existence at the time the permitted activity was established?

  1. Where a certificate of compliance has been issued under s 139 of the Resource Management Act, is the holder of the certificate subject to a continuing obligation to abide by the noise limitations specified in Rule 31.11.1.2, notwithstanding the changing surrounding physical environment?

____________________________________________________________________

Solicitors:
Corcoran French, Kaiapoi for Applicant
Cavell Leitch, Christchurch for Respondent

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
FMV v TZB [2018] NZHC 1131

Cases Citing This Decision

2

FMV v TZB [2018] NZHC 1131
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0