Munford v Mr & Le Munford Limited
[2018] NZHC 2473
•20 September 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND PALMERSTON NORTH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE PAPAIOEA ROHE
CIV-2018-454-000092
[2018] NZHC 2473
UNDER The Companies Act and Part 18 of the High Court Rules 2016 IN THE MATTER OF
application for rectification of a Share
Register under section 91 and an application for relief under section 174, and of claims in equity
BETWEEN
MICHAEL RICHARD MUNFORD
Plaintiff
AND
MR & LE MUNFORD LIMITED
First Defendant
HAYDEN TRAVIS RANKIN
Second DefendantJANARA NZ LIMITED and JANARA ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Third Defendants
Hearing: (On the papers) Judgment:
20 September 2018
JUDGMENT OF COLLINS J
[1] A without notice application for an interim injunction has been referred to me as Duty Judge.
[2] The application has been made without notice because the plaintiff is concerned that the second defendant could attempt to pass a special resolution placing the first defendant into liquidation, “at a moment’s notice”.
MUNFORD v MR & LE MUNFORD LTD [2018] NZHC 2473 [20 September 2018]
[3] It is, however, essential that the first and second defendants be given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the application.
[4] To achieve this, I will issue the interim injunction sought by the plaintiff but, for a strictly limited period of time.
[5] The application and supporting affidavits are to be served on the first and second defendants. The Court will make time available to hear the application for an injunction on Tuesday 2 October 2018. Two hours have been allocated.
[6] If Mr Mahuta-Coyle is unable to appear that day, alternative counsel will need to be instructed.
[7] In the meantime, I grant the interim application sought until further order of the Court. I do so because, I am satisfied there is a reasonably arguably claim and the balance of convenience justifies the granting of the interim injunction for the limited period that I have indicated.
D B Collins J
Solicitors:
Integra Law Limited, Paraparaumu for Plaintiff
0
0