| IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA |
| CA414/2019 [2021] NZCA 260 |
| BETWEEN | OFA MOTULIKI |
| AND | THE QUEEN |
| Hearing: | 17 June 2021 |
Court: | Brown, Brewer and Davison JJ |
Counsel: | No appearance by the Appellant |
Judgment: | 17 June 2021 |
Reasons: | 18 June 2021 at 4.00 pm |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Brown J)
This appeal was set down for hearing at midday on 17 June 2021. Mr Motuliki did not attend. Consequently his appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Motuliki v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NZCA 260
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the Court of Appeal had to address was whether the appellant's non-attendance at the scheduled hearing constituted sufficient grounds to dismiss the appeal. The Court considered the rules and precedents governing the dismissal of appeals for want of prosecution and determined that the appellant's absence warranted such a dismissal.
In delivering the judgment, Brown J noted that the appeal was set for hearing on 17 June 2021, but Mr Motuliki did not attend. The Court found that the appellant's failure to appear at the hearing resulted in the dismissal of his appeal for want of prosecution. The judgment was given on the same day as the hearing, and the reasons were provided the following day, on 18 June 2021.
The Court's final order was the dismissal of the appellant's appeal for want of prosecution. This decision was based on the appellant's non-attendance at the scheduled hearing, which the Court found to be a valid ground for dismissing the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.