IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2017-404-296
[2018] NZHC 1630
BETWEEN MOTAIREHE WHANGA TE URI O RANGIHOKAIA KO NGĀTIWAI KI AOTEA INCORPORATED
PlaintiffAND
NICOLA MACDONALD AND KRIS MACDONALD AS TRUSTEES OF THE NGĀTI REHUA – NGĀTIWAI KI AOTEA TRUST BOARD
Defendants
Hearing: On the papers Appearances:
P F Chambers for the Plaintiff S Wroe for the Defendants
Judgment:
4 July 2018
JUDGMENT OF WOODHOUSE J
(Costs)
Solicitors / Counsel:
Mr P F Chambers, Barrister, Auckland
Mr M Henley-Smith (plaintiff’s instructing solicitor), Henley-Smith Law, Solicitors, Auckland Ms S Wroe, Barrister, Auckland
Ms J Braithwaite (defendants’ instructing solicitor), Braithwaite & Smail Ltd, Solicitors, Auckland
MOTAIREHE WHANGA TE URI O RANGIHOKAIA KO NGĀTIWAI KI AOTEA INCORPORATED v NICOLA MACDONALD AND KRIS MACDONALD AS TRUSTEES OF THE NGĀTI REHUA – NGĀTIWAI KI AOTEA TRUST BOARD [2018] NZHC 1630 [4 July 2018]
[1] The defendants seek an order fixing costs following the substantive judgment striking out the plaintiff’s claim, and an application for a preservation order, and awarding costs to the defendants.1
[2] There is a memorandum for the defendants in support of an application for costs on the 2B scale in a sum of $20,962, plus disbursements totaling $770.
[3] A memorandum for the plaintiff was not filed by 29 June, as required. Following an enquiry by the case officer, at my request, counsel for the plaintiff advised that he had been unable to obtain instructions. He responsibly noted that, from his perspective, he could not fault the memorandum for the defendants as to the category of costs and steps taken.
[4] I am satisfied the matter should now be determined. I am also satisfied the defendants are entitled to the 2B costs they seek of $20,962. The disbursements include GST. On the assumption that the Ngāti Rehua – Ngātiwai Ki Aotea Trust Board is a GST registered party, which seems likely, and on the further assumption that the Trust Board will be meeting the costs of the named defendants, the disbursements should be reduced to the GST exclusive sum of $669.57.
[5] There is accordingly an order that the plaintiff pay the defendants’ costs and disbursements in a total sum of $21,631.57.
Woodhouse J
1 Motairehe Whanga Te Uri o Rangihokaia Ko Ngātiwai Ki Aotea Incorporated v Nicola MacDonald and Kris MacDonald as trustees of the Ngāti Rehua - Ngātiwai Ki Aotea Trust Board [2018] NZHC 1231.
- AGLC
- Motairehe Whanga Te Uri o Rangihokaia Ko ngatiwai Ki Aotea Incorporated v MacDonald [2018] NZHC 1630
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 1630
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to decide whether the defendants were entitled to the costs claimed. The plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition to the defendants' memorandum. The court considered the defendants' memorandum for costs and determined it was appropriate for the court to award the costs claimed. The court also reduced the amount of disbursements claimed by the defendants to account for GST.
The court ordered that the plaintiff pay the defendants' costs and disbursements in a total sum of $21,631.57. The court found that the defendants were entitled to the costs claimed and that the plaintiff had failed to file a memorandum in opposition. The court also considered the defendants' memorandum for costs and determined it was appropriate for the court to award the costs claimed. The court further reduced the amount of disbursements claimed by the defendants to account for GST.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.