Mobil Oil New Zealand Limited v Development Auckland Limited

Case

[2015] NZSC 177

20 November 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 107/2015
[2015] NZSC 177
BETWEEN

MOBIL OIL NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Applicant

AND

DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (FORMERLY AUCKLAND WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIMITED)
Respondent

Court:

Elias CJ, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ

Counsel:

M G Ring QC and P R Rzepecky for Applicant
A R Galbraith QC and M C Smith for Respondent

Judgment:

20 November 2015

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

AThe application for leave to appeal is granted (Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Ltd v Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZCA 390).

BThe approved questions are:

(a)     Did the “clean and tidy” clauses in the 1985 leases between Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd and the Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Ltd require Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd to remediate any hydrocarbon contamination of the leased land on termination of the leases?

(b)     If not, is Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd liable for the costs of remediating any such contamination on the basis that it breached an implied term in the leases not to commit waste?

(c)     If the answer to either (a) or (b) is “yes”, does the remediation obligation relate only to hydrocarbon contamination caused since 1985 or does it extend to contamination caused to the land since 1925?

____________________________________________________________________

Solicitors:
Greenwood Roche, Wellington for Applicant
Gilbert/Walker, Auckland for Respondent

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0