Manchester Securities Ltd v Body Corporate 172108
Case
•
[2017] NZCA 527
•17 November 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Manchester Securities Limited v Body Corporate 172108 [2017] NZCA 527
[2017] NZCA 527
17 November 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In 2011, the High Court approved a remediation scheme under the Unit Titles Act for a leaky apartment complex known as Hobson Apartments. Manchester Securities Limited, the owner of the top floor, was required to contribute to the cost of repairs to common property in the building. Two years later, the Body Corporate, representing the other unit owners, applied for a variation of the scheme on the grounds that a major cost blow out had rendered the scheme unjust. Fogarty J allowed the application and ordered Manchester to make a payment to the Body Corporate as a provisional sum. Both Manchester and the Body Corporate appealed. Manchester's appeal was dismissed and it was ordered to pay the Body Corporate's costs. The Body Corporate's appeal against the costs decision was also dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Variation of Judgment
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Body Corporate 172108 v Cummins [2025] NZHC 1378
Cases Citing This Decision
58
Robert James Cummins v Body Corporate 172108
[2022] NZSC 95
Manchester Securities Ltd v Body Corporate 172108
[2018] NZSC 19
Cummins v Body Corporate 172108
[2024] NZCA 303
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0
Body Corporate 172108 v Manchester Securities Ltd
[2017] NZHC 329
Tisch v Body Corporate No 318596
[2011] NZCA 420
Berachan Investments Ltd v Body Corporate 164205
[2012] NZCA 256