Malcolm Edward Rabson v Wayne Seymour Chapman

[2016] NZSC 77

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC 18/2016
[2016] NZSC 77

BETWEEN	MALCOLM EDWARD RABSON Applicant
AND	WAYNE SEYMOUR CHAPMAN Respondent

Court:	William Young, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ
Counsel:	Applicant in person S A Barker for Respondent
Judgment:	24 June 2016

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for recall is dismissed.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. The applicant, Mr Rabson, has applied for the recall of the Court’s judgment dismissing his application for leave to appeal.[1] 

   [1]Rabson v Chapman [2016] NZSC 45.

2. The grounds which Mr Rabson advances in support of his recall application are simply reiterations of the grounds he raised in his original leave application.  Nothing new having been raised, the application for recall is dismissed.  As the respondent has not been required to file submissions, there is no order for costs.

Solicitors:
Buddle Findlay, Wellington for Respondent