IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
CIV-2018-409-000509
[2018] NZHC 3097
UNDER THE WILLS ACT 2007 IN THE MATTER OF
ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER JAMES MAGUIRE
BETWEEN
HEATHER MARGARET MAGUIRE
Plaintiff
AND
BRIAN JOHN MAGUIRE
Defendant
Hearing: 22 November 2018 Appearances:
J Stringer for Plaintiff Defendant in person
Judgment:
28 November 2018
JUDGMENT OF DUNNINGHAM J
Introduction
[1] This is an application by the plaintiff, Heather Margaret Maguire, to validate a letter dated 24 October 2014 (the 2014 letter) as a will confirming the testamentary intentions of her late son, Christopher James Maguire (Chris).
[2]Mr Maguire, Chris’s father, opposes the application.
MAGUIRE v MAGUIRE [2018] NZHC 3097 [28 November 2018]
Background
[3] Chris was born on 12 November 1988. He lived with his mother, father and sister in Timaru until his parents separated in mid-2009. After that Chris relocated to Christchurch as did his mother. In the period 2008 to 2011, Chris undertook studies at Polytech and completed New Zealand Army Basic Training, although at other times he was unemployed. During this period he lived with his mother with the exception of the nine month period when he attended basic training in 2008.
[4] Sadly, Chris’s sister, Tracey, was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2008 and she died in March 2010. As Mrs Maguire explains in her affidavit evidence, Chris and Tracey were very close and she believes he never quite got over her death. Regrettably, Chris then succumbed to alcoholism and, from around 2011, he was on a sickness benefit and unable to work. It was withdrawal from alcohol that caused him to have a seizure, collapse and suffer the head injury that tragically took his life in late 2014.
[5] Mrs Maguire supported her son Chris financially and emotionally until his death. She explains that Chris did not pay rent when he lived with her. It seems, too, she dealt with the harsh reality of living day to day with his alcoholism. Chris had little contact with his father after the move to Christchurch, and although he would sometimes accompany his mother to Timaru to see his grandmother, she says he generally chose not to visit his father at the same time. In addition, Mr Maguire made almost no contact with his son Chris, nor did he travel to Christchurch to visit him.
The estate
[6] Chris’s estate is limited. He owns some personal items, an extensive DVD collection and has a small amount of money in his Kiwibank account. The only asset of any value is a life insurance policy which was taken out in 2010. Mrs Maguire paid the premiums on it for the period 2013 to 2016. She explains that Chris was going to cancel the policy because he could not afford it. However, she said she would cover the cost until he sorted himself out. After some resistance from the insurance company, the policy has eventually been paid out, and the sum of around $160,000…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Maguire v Maguire and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 3097
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court noted that the focus should be on the substance of the document rather than its form, and that the deceased had expressed his intention that the letter be treated as his will. The court also found that the deceased had taken steps to ensure that the letter was written when he was of sound mind and had correctly identified all the assets which comprised his estate. The court rejected the submissions of the deceased's father that the letter was not a valid expression of his son's testamentary intentions, and validated the letter as the will of Christopher James Maguire. The court reserved the issue of costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.