Lloyd v Marama HC Rotorua CIV 2009-463-172
[2010] NZHC 2105
•24 November 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY
CIV 2009-463-000172
BETWEEN RONALD MERVYN LLOYD AND JOHN ANDREW LLOYD AND STEVEN MARLIN LLOYD
Plaintiffs
ANDDANIELA MARAMA First Defendant
ANDKEVIN JOHN BUSCH Second Defendant
Hearing: 23 November 2010
Appearances: M Armstrong for the Plaintiff
Judgment: 24 November 2010
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE CHRISTIANSEN
This judgment was delivered by me on
24.11.10 at 4.30pm, pursuant to
Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date……………
Solicitors/Counsel:
M Armstrong, Aurere Law, Rotorua – [email protected]
RONALD MERVYN LLOYD AND JOHN ANDREW LLOYD AND STEVEN MARLIN LLOYD V DANIELA MARAMA AND ANOR HC ROT CIV 2009-463-000172 24 November 2010
ANDHELENA GARVIN Third Defendant
ANDDAVID GALVIN Fourth Defendant
ANDERIC ROBIN LLOYD Fifth Defendant
[1] The claim is supported by the affidavit of a plaintiff and in evidence from Mr Barry Hadley a consulting accountant who has frequently given expert evidence before the High Court.
[2] In support of the application for formal proof Mr Armstrong has provided a comprehensive memorandum which describes the breakdown of a business relationship due, the plaintiffs say, to a scam to extract money from them.
[3] The plaintiffs’ claim alleges conversion and breach of contract. The claim for damages includes:
a) The costs to recover the land lost because it was the only security provided for loans advanced for the business venture;
b) Damages for loss of profit over the failed business venture;
c) Losses continuing to accumulate from that time Mr Hadley calculated those losses.
[4] I am satisfied that all losses claimed have been properly identified and I order the first, second and third and fifth defendants jointly and severally be ordered to pay:
a) $324,958.55 for the loss of the land;
b) Damages in the sum of $740,000 for the loss of opportunity from
1 April 2003 to 31 August 2010;
c) Damages in the sum of $8,333 per month from 31 August 2010 to the date of this judgment;
d) Interest pursuant to the Judicature Act 1908;
e) Costs on a category 2B basis.
Associate Judge Christiansen
0
0
1