Lam v Mo

Case [2021] NZHC 3200


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE

CIV-2013-485-001736

[2021] NZHC 3200

BETWEEN MAN FUNG LAM, YUET MING BETTY WONG and MORAL DRAGON LIMITED
Plaintiffs

AND

CHIU CHEUNG MO and LILY YUET HA WONG

First Defendants

AND

SUNLINK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

Second Defendants

AND

PLIMMERTON HEIGHTS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

Third Defendants

AND

STEVEN WEE HONG LEE

Fourth Defendant

Hearing: On the papers

Judgment:

26 November 2021


JUDGMENT OF NATION J


[1]                 This judgment records the orders the Court must make consequent to judgments of 16 May 2017, 13 February 2018 and 6 July 2021, and the terms on which a property controlled by the first defendants is to be sold.

[2]                 On 13 August 2021, counsel for the Lams and the fourth defendant filed a joint memorandum setting out the precise terms of proposed orders.

LAM v MO [2021] NZHC 3200 [26 November 2021]

[3]                 On 19 October 2021, counsel for the first, second and third defendants filed a response in which they agreed with the judgments sum calculations and the proposed terms of the sale of the property at 1 Mo Street. Counsel anticipate that changes may need to be made to the directions in relation to the sale of the property and request an order be made allowing those directions to be made by agreement between the parties, should the need arise. Given the protracted nature of this litigation, in my view, it is more appropriate that an order be made reserving leave for the parties to apply to the Court to amend directions in relation to the sale of 1 Mo Street.

The orders

[4]                 Pursuant to the judgments of this Court of 16 May 2017, 13 February 2018 and 6 July 2021, the abovenamed first defendants are jointly and severally to pay to the abovenamed plaintiffs the sum of $315,329, comprising:

Paragraph reference in judgment dated 6 July 2021

Amount

[80] 35% profit determination

$57,475

[80] Interest on $57,475 at 5% from 20 June 2013 to 6 July 2021

$23,115

[81] 35% net sale proceeds of 14 Mo Street

$96,856

[81] Interest on $96,856 at 5% from 15 February 2019 to 6 July 2021

$11,543

[83] Costs and disbursements for period up to 16 May 2017

$107,158

[85] Costs for the period 9 November 2018 to 6 July 2021

$19,182

TOTAL

$315,329

[5]The property at 1 Mo Street is to be sold on the following terms:

1.           The land at 1 Mo Street, Camborne, Porirua (the Land), is to be sold. The parties will implement the following within seven days of the date of judgment:

(a) The appointment of a Real Estate Agent to market the Land and

conduct the sale

If the parties are unable to agree to a single agent being appointed, then each of the parties can appoint a Real Estate Agent to jointly undertake the sale of the Land.

(b) The setting of a market price for the sale of the Land

If the parties are unable to agree to the market price, then each party is to appoint a registered valuer within three days. The valuers so appointed shall consult and agree to a market price within three days. If the valuers are unable to agree to the market price range, then it shall be decided by the President of the New Zealand Institute of Valuers.

2.           The parties are to take recommendation from the appointed Sales Agent(s), as to the best method of sale.

3.           Acceptance of any offer is to be agreed to by both parties. The parties shall act in good faith to expedite the sale and to consider any reasonable offers promptly. If the parties are unable to agree, then the procedure set out in para 1(b) shall apply to the decision to accept an offer.

4.           The defendants are to promptly provide all information concerning the Land and the subdivision to allow the Agent(s) to effectively market the sale.

5.           On appointing the Sales Agent(s), the parties are to agree on the information to be disclosed to prospective purchasers.

6.           The defendants are to sign all documentation required to allow the sale to proceed.

7.           The proceeds of sale (after payment of agents commission and legal costs for the conveyancing and the costs of any process under paragraph 1(b)) shall be paid to the trust account of Morrison Kent.

[6]                 Following the sale of 1 Mo Street, 35 per cent of the net proceeds of sale are to be held to the credit of the plaintiffs but, from their share of the proceeds of sale, payment is to be made directly to:

(a)        the fourth defendant of:

i.$52,954, being costs ordered on 13 February 2018 by Churchman J;1

ii.$8,977, being interest on those costs at five per cent from 13 February 2018 to 6 July 2021; and

iii.$1838, being scale costs on a 2B basis for the filing of various post judgment memoranda.

(b)       the first defendants of $321,000, as referred to in para [218] of the Court’s judgment of 16 May 20172 and para [24] of the Court’s judgment of 6 July 2021;3 and

(c)        the plaintiffs the balance then remaining.

[7]                 The remaining 65 per cent of the net proceeds of sale from 1 Mo Street is to be paid to the first defendants.

[8]                 Leave is reserved to the parties to seek any further orders that may be required to complete the sale of the property at 1 Mo Street and the implementation of these orders.

Solicitors:

R J B Fowler, Barrister, Wellington

Paul Cheung & Co., Solicitors, Wellington Morrison Kent, Lawyers, Wellington

Fee Langstone, Auckland.


1      Lam v Wong [2018] NZHC 116.

2      Lam v Mo [2017] NZHC 997.

3      Lam v Mo [2021] NZHC 1663.

Details
AGLC
Lam v Mo [2021] NZHC 3200
Case
[2021] NZHC 3200
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Man Fung Lam, Yuet Ming Betty Wong, and Moral Dragon Limited, and multiple defendants, including Chiu Cheung Mo and Lily Yuet Ha Wong, Sunlink Developments Limited, Plimmerton Heights Construction Limited, and Steven Wee Hong Lee. The matter before the court was the sale of a property at 1 Mo Street, following previous judgments and the calculation of various amounts owed by the defendants. The court was required to decide on the terms and conditions for the sale of the property and the distribution of proceeds from the sale. Additionally, the court had to confirm the amounts owed by the defendants to the plaintiffs, including costs, interest, and profit determinations.

The court provided detailed orders for the sale of the property, including the appointment of a real estate agent, setting of a market price, and the method of sale. The court also outlined the procedures for accepting offers and the disclosure of information to prospective buyers. Regarding the distribution of proceeds from the sale, the court ordered that 35% of the net proceeds be held for the plaintiffs, with specific payments to be made to the fourth defendant and the first defendants from these proceeds. The remaining 65% of the net proceeds were to be paid to the first defendants. Furthermore, the court reserved leave for the parties to apply to amend any directions related to the sale if necessary.

In conclusion, the court ordered the sale of the property at 1 Mo Street under specific terms, with the proceeds to be distributed according to the court's directions. The court confirmed the amounts owed by the defendants to the plaintiffs and provided for the possibility of amending the sale directions by agreement of the parties or through further court orders if required. The judgment effectively concludes the financial and property-related aspects of the protracted litigation between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.